on 04-22-2014 4:07 PM
Hi Experts,
In EWM, one Inbound delivery with multiple materials (more than 300 items and packing more than 1000 HUs) need to be putaway with warehouse tasks. System took more than 3 mins to create WTs. Our client think this performance cannot be accepted.
Who can advise how to optimize the system to create WT in EWM? We are using EWM standard function to create WT for putaway.
Thanks,
Julia
Hello Julia,
there are some settings in Customizing with reference to parallel creation of WTs, under "Cross-Process Settings" and "Goods Receipt Process".
With "Define General Settings for Parallel Processing and Performance" you can activate the parallel processing for some settings, with "Activate Parallel Processing for Inbound WT Creation" you define the details for inbound WTs. Did you check there already?
Brgds
Juergen
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Julia
I have also experienced the similar issue when I tried to create WTs for around 50 HUs, it took much time (though it is sandbox, this is less performance). What I guess is, it may also depends on your enterprise structure and put away rules. I mean to say if there are more conditions and logics to perform to determin destination bin for each HU, it might take lot time.
Please update if you find some solution.
Thanks
Sasidhar Gupta
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Julia,
Question: Are you using PPF action to create the Putaway WTs? If so, you can work with your basis team to figure out how you can add more resources to support the Queue load. One thing you can do immediately is to turn off WT logging in /SCWM/ACTLOG this will most probably increase performance by how much i am not sure but worth a try.
Thanks,
Faical
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
15 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.