on 03-12-2014 7:02 AM
Hi,
I have two discount condition types (MPDI,ZSDI) in my pricing procedure,at the time of sales order creation one discount condition is not appearing.
On analyzing the condition type MPDI,system throws message "Access not been executed due to previous access",what would be the reason.
In the billing ,i could see the condition type appearing.I have checked this,but i could not understand why it is happening.Even the condition catergory of condition is empty not L.
Also please find the screen shots below,
Pradeep
Now i can get the condition type MPDI in sales order also,the root cause is in the condition type is a check box Condition update,when it is unchecked,i can get the price in Sales order also.
If condition update is checked i could not get the condition type in Sales order but in invoice,i want to know what this is happening.Please find the below screen shot.
Pradeep
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Pradeep,
Am sure user might have deleted the condition type in sales order, the same condition type woudl have entered manually in invoice.
Please check my testing, i have done the same entered ZA09 manually and after saving have deleted again in sales order, after dilivery and when i created invoice here i have entered manually the same condition type.
So in your case also the same thing could have happend, check the change log and also in invoce condtion tab check the condtion type in analysis ( Invoice analysis not order). so that you can udnerstand whether it was entered manully or not.
On analyzing the condition type MPDI,system throws message "Access not been executed due to previous access",what would be the reason.
This is because in the condtion tyoe the abvoe key combiantion was found with records hence the below key combition was ignored. this you observe in your screen shot with with 5.00
So my guess is the condtion records was deleted in sales order.
thanks,
srinu.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
On analyzing the condition type MPDI,system throws message "Access not been executed due to previous access",what would be the reason.
This is because in the condtion tyoe the abvoe key combiantion was found with records hence the below key combition was ignored. this you observe in your screen shot with with 5.00
So my guess is the condtion records was deleted in sales order.
thanks,
srinu.
I did not do anything even the condition type is not appearing in sales order,what would be the reason
Hi Pradeep,
Please check the following. I believe that one of them seems to be causing the problem:
* Please check the calculation type that you have used in MPDI and ZSDI.
* Check the access sequence that you have used. If you have checked the "Exclusive" indicator, it is possible that once the first condition is met and the record is determined, the rest would be ignored. This might be the case if you have used the same calculation type in both condition types.
* I also noticed that you have used line no. 10 (Price) as the "From" value for both the discount condition types that you have added in the pricing procedure.This would mean that both these conditions are exactly the same (except for the condition record value). The system would hence take the first condition and ignore the rest (if the exclusive indicator is checked).
Please check the above and let me know if this works.
Regards,
Sumita Mittra
Dear Pradeep,
I think it is the matter of access sequence. Please check is there more than one table in access seq.
SPRO --> Sales and Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Pricing Control --> Define Access Sequences.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
97 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.