on 03-04-2014 9:21 PM
Dear Experts,
Please let me know the advantages and disadvantages of using JMS adapter in PO (AEX). We have a requirement to access multiple files (100 different files) from an application which is on the same DC and network. This can be achieved by using simple file communication by having 100 different file channels. I would also like to explore other option like JMS, though there is no requirement for sequential processing. Hence, seeking your help in understanding the advantages / disadvantages of using JMS over FTP communication.
Thank you.
Lakshman V.
Thank you Harish / Amit... I heard lot of noice around having the intial setup (JMS connection factory). Precisely, I have to take a decission on to go with FTP or JMS. We will be having more than 100 interfaces between AMT Marketflow and PO (7.4). Looking for advises.. Do let me know if you need more information.
Thank you.
Lakshman V.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Lakshman,
JMS -
Pros - JMS provide guaranteed delivery of message.
Cons - Needs to install MQ (if not available) on PI and target system
Need to develop the JMS queue (if not available) and build the script to transfer the file
FTP
Pros - No need of extra development
No installation is req.
Cons - FTP can use lot of CPU threads on server.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.