on 02-24-2014 8:28 AM
Hello Jorg,
May I ask you to check a couple of things more ?
(1) When you run the transaction to generate search terms for BP, do you use radio button "Changed Partners Addresses only" or "All partners addresses" ?
(2) Do you use a user-exit / BADI to filter the replication of customers/vendors from ECC to GTS ? If the code in the user-exit/BADI is not written correctly, then in some cases the BP address is lost during the transfer from ECC to GTS.
Regards.
Mouaz BEN REDJEB
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jorg,
Thanks for checking. Looks quite strange for me. You said BP is of type 2 Organisation and the above mentioned FM is giving out all the details. So, once this is clear- System is trying to split the terms as per the logic.
So, I really don't understand why it's not working. Did you change anything in the configuration settings for SPLUS?
Can you please open SAP Global Trade Services->SAP Compliance Management->Sanctioned party list screening->Define Control procedure for Address Comparison.
Please see if you have some Address version mentioned for your control procedure SPLUS.
If its blank as shown in the screenshot. Then I don't find any other option than debugging directly.
Please ask your ABAPer to debug the same and see if there is some condition which fails.
Regards
Dhilipan
Hi Jörg,
I took a quick look at the program code in that area. The code behaves differently depending on whether the address is for a Person or an Organisation. Maybe you could check in the BP master record if the problem is related to that?
Regards,
Dave
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jorg,
I believe system is not able to find any values under Name1,Name2, Name3, Name4,Street, City,Country for the Partner and Address#.
Can you please check if there are any values for the above mentioned fields in the Partner or Address#?
May be some data inconsistency because city is a mandatory field. System should be able to pick up the city at least.
Thanks
Dhilipan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Jorg,
Can you execute FM "/SAPSLL/CORE_ADDR_GET" with your Address number as parameter IV_ADRNR_NEW and blank value for iv_nation_new?
Please let us know if you see some values in the result.
I am assuming you haven't changed anything for the standard legal regulation SPLUS?
Basically, I see system is trying to get the data using the above mentioned FM. If not, then system assumes that the partner is not of type 1 - Organisation and starts looking for person address.
Regards
Dhilipan
User | Count |
---|---|
14 | |
4 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.