cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

QP60 Change Histry

former_member620323
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi all,

I am facing one problem as - When I change the Inspection Plan Header Old Number with Change No. System isn't updating Old No. Changes, Its Showing Change No. only.

Attached Change No.& QP60 Screen Shot.

Please Suggest..

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

When you changed any data in inspection plan , it seems to be same , but you created inspection plan with same mareial then it create new group counter. please check it.

Regard's

Sameer

former_member620323
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Awaiting reply..

Former Member
0 Kudos

Do u what old number and new change number also?

Please reframe ur question for better understanding

former_member620323
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Yes I want both the figure, Existing & New one..

I have Created Change No. as shown in Screen shot. When I go to Change mode of Inspection plan for Editing in Old No. field (Header) with Change No. then Change value & Previous value is not showing in QP60 tcode. Its showing Change No. Only.

Awaiting for your valuable Suggestion....

Former Member
0 Kudos

Use QP61

Enter required details, u will find such type of details

double click on required line.

u will find details of old and new change number

Hope this will be useful

Message was edited by: YOGINI B. THORAT

former_member620323
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

There is no problem with Lower limit, Upper limit, UoM, Decimal points. Problem is in Old task list no. its not updating changes in Change History.

Former Member
0 Kudos

The snapshot which I pasted is just a example.

In QP61 tcode,u will find all change history, even if u change ' change number' it will be present in old and new value

former_member620323
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Yogini,

Yes its showing in QP61, but its showing report Group wise.

I have 4-5 group counters in single group.  so Its better if it working for QP60 as well.

Thanks,

Rahul