Vendor Text in PO is not in a proper alignment

[Former Member]

Hi

When supplier text is maintained in SC( 1000011802) under notes & attachments , once approved. The same details are not reflecting in the PO in a proper alignment.

Not able to correct the texts in PO as well.

Thanks in Advance

Ajit

[ivy_li]

Hi Ajit,

Would you please show me the supplier text in PO with picture?

Please also tell me the SRM server release you used.

Best regards,

Ivy

[Former Member]

Hi Lvy

We are using SRM 7.02(Classic) and ECC EHP 6

This is how the supplier text looks.  Line 2 and 3 has been dis-aligned.

Regards

Ajit

[ivy_li]

Hi Ajit,

Are you using extended classic scenario, right?

If so, I suggest you directly insert the vendor text to one new SRM PO to see if the issue persists.

If not, this means the problem only occured during creation from SC.

Meanwhile, would you please check the following related notes?

1859525 SC Supplier text is not transfered to PO.

1777308 While adding items to PO via SC,text is not copying properly

1660717 Long text is not mapped correctly when PO is created from SC

Please tell me the test results.

Best regards,

Ivy

[ivy_li]

Hi Ajit,

Would you please also check if doc_change or doc_save BADI for SC and PO has coding related to vendor text?

If so, please deactivate them and retest.

Please also check if the following notes are applied:

1830385

1604293

1662702

Best regards,

Ivy

[Former Member]

Hi Lvy

We are using classic scenario.

Please suggest.

Thanks

Ajit

[ivy_li]

Hi Ajit,

If you are using clasic scenario, the following note should solve the issue:

1640490 - Unformatting of header and item long text in backend PO

Best regards,

Ivy

[Former Member]

Hi Lvy

Our PO is created in XML, so this Note didn't help

Thanks

Ajit

[ivy_li]

Hi Ajit,

I suggest you check if the text is correctly formatted in outbound XML.

If it failed in outbound XML, then the issue should be in SRM side.

If it failed in inbound XML(ECC side), the issue should be corrected by ECC side.

Anyway, I don't know why you said note 1640490 is not useful for your release.

Best regards,

Ivy