Risk of using Reconstruct

[Former Member]

Hi,

My client has a Z program that transfers stock from one project to another with 415Q mov, at the same time a devolution and a suplement in IM. then after IM movements the program runs CJEN and CJBN.

This program runs about 1000 movements per day , my question is if it would be harmful to run so many times CJEN and CJBN

Thanks!

[raghavendra_praveen · Accepted solution]

Hi

CJEN restructures the project info database with costs.

Refer to SAP help:

It deletes the data records of the projects selected on the selection screen from the RPSCO / RPSQT and sets 

them up again based on tables BPPE, BPJA, BPGE, COSP, COSS, COSPP, COSSP, COSB, COSR, FMSU and FMSP.

It doesnot create any problem and only syncs up with BCS/IM budgeting with that of PS.

Can you pls tell why are you running the CJBN/CJBV transaction which alters the budget availability setting. This may lead to inconsistency in the terms of assigned values etc or improper consumption of budgets in both the projects. Unless there is a specific need to transfer using 415Q or Proj to Proj transfer, why you dont directly purchase on the other project?

In future if you want to reconcile the PS reports for any good reason, these many movements with budget deactivation/activation may trouble/confuse you.

It would be better if you can provide the reason why you want to create such movements using Z program..

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Thanks Raghavendra,

The client makes  POs of several materials once a year for cost savings, the client created ONE project in the company to make all  purchases to  project stock, this project is never setted, They create the  projects  during the year so the stock is transferred as needed with this Z program . With this process the goal  is to control the budget of the centralized POs and the cost of each individual project.

Regards

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

You need to look at the standard SAP PS functionality called requirement Grouping (look up Grouping, Pegging, and Distribution or GPD)  This eliminates the need for a custom program to move stock between WBS stock segments.

[raghavendra_praveen · Accepted solution]

Requirement grouping will serve the purpose here.Refer to SAP help http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/d3/a5111ae32311d1a6ab0000e83235d4/content.htm

Is there a specific reason why this functionality is not implemented?

This functionality can also be met through Funds Management (BCS) to combine the material purchase centrally.

Thanks

[Former Member]

Great advices! , thanks to all

[former_member209919]

HI Charles,

THese transactions should be executed only to fix the information but there  is not problem if you execute it but:

WHich is the objective to execute them?

Transaction CJBN deactivate an activate the budget availability control, then generate change in the WBS status ( this is geristered).

Regatds

[Former Member]

Thanks , it is supposed that every time IM52 runs, availability control is deactivated, that is the reason CJBN is included, I think it would be better to set a job to run cjbv,and not  to run this transactions every time stock is transferred.

Regards,

[former_member195427]

Hi

As far as I know there is no harm in running these transactions.

Thanks