on 11-27-2013 8:35 PM
I'm thinking about putting in an OSS note on this but I'd like to see if any other people see this same behavior.
In QA32, I can go to the dynamic selections and add "Vendor Batch" as a selection item.
In the selection screen I enter in a material number that I know has inspection lots out there and that I know has the "Vendor Batch" field populated in the batch master.
I then execute the selection and QA32 returns no inspection lots.
If I remove the vendor batch number from the selection criteria and rerun just using material number, I get many batches of the material.
If I put in the vendor batch number and execute again, no inspection lots are found.
I would think this is a bug. Can someone else verify what I'm seeing? I couldn't find any OSS notes on this nor could I find any discussion on this. If it can be verified some where else, I'll put up an OSSS note on it.
This is a 6.0 system. NO EHP 4.
Craig
Thanks to all for those who tested this.
What I was able to find out through more testing and you input is that the vendor batch is evidently not being searched for in MSC2n but comes from QALS.
So if you manually change the vendor batch in MSC2n, (i.e. a direct correction), or you add a vendor batch to a batch that was received originally without putting a vendor batch at GR, the qa32/33 dynamic vender batch selection will not find the new value.
For some businesses this could be an issue. For most it's just an awareness of how this works.
Craig
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Mr. Craig
So you mean to say if vendor batch is maintained in PO then it will be searched since it was there during GR. And that's why we didn't see it by putting it in batch master.
Pl clear one more thing. What if it was initially not maintained, then a GR is done. But later if we modify the same PO and now put the vendor batch and then do GR. Would system consider it and display inspection lots ??
ntn
It is only available for searching when it is contained in the QALS table. It is put in the QALS table when the inspection lot is created at the GR. Therefore, any changes made in MSC2n have no effect on the original inspection lot.
If a batch did not have a vendor batch recorded at GR, (and it was maintained via MSC2n later), you will not be able to find it in QA32 using vendor batch as a search criteria.
If you use MSC2n to make a correction to the vendor batch number, (say a typo was made), the change does not update the QALS table so again, you won't find the inspection lot.
Craig
Having a 6.0 system with EHP 4 I have no problem searching for vendor batches.
Regards
MH
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Mr Craig,
I ran a similar scenario by maintaining the vendor batch through MSC2N and executing the QA32 following your steps.
Behavior in my case is no different and I couldn't see any inspection lot when Vendor batch is given in selection criteria.
This is probably a bug or we might have been missing some settings.
Regards,
ntn
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Mr. Craig,
Im using 6.0 with EHP6. I had tested the scenario with maintaining the Vendor batch through MSC2N and this might be the reason I didn't get similar results what Amol has achieved. I cant say.
I'll rerun the scenario with puting Vendor batch in PO itself and then generating inspection lots.
Will let you know the results I get then.
ntn
Hello Mr Craig,
I have rerun the scenario. I put the Vendor batch number in PO this time and completed the GR process.
Then In QA32, I performed following and got the results as given,
I don't know how did you maintain the scenario at you end. If you did what I did earlier, I think you would need to do it again by maintaining the Vendor batch in PO.
Besides, please let me know if this is the real cause.
As in, do we really need to maintain the vendor batch in PO itself or this cycle must also run when this batch is not maintained in PO but added later in batch master??
Regards,
ntn
Probabaly search criteria does not work on this field because its not available in report display
I tried to pull Vendor Batch not equal to Blank and it worked, but no display of vendor batch
DD
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.