cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Withdrawal Qty from ECC not converted to Base UoM of APO

former_member215376
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Experts,

We are experiencing incorrect behavior in getting the withdrawal quantities from ECC to APO. In RRP3 Forecast tab, the Withdrawal Qty is not converted to the Base Unit or Measure maintained in APO. For example, in ECC the qty is 300 BOT, in APO it is 300 CS. What master data should we check to resolve this issue? I also noticed that the UoM of the MAT1 has a message ' Gross weight is less than net weight'. Does it have any effect on the issue? Thank you.

Regards,

AA

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member215376
Participant
0 Kudos

One thing I found as well is that the BOT in ECC is not maintained in APO ( only BT is defined). Do we need to add or change the UoM conversion in APO side manually or get that from ECC? Thanks

former_member215376
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Experts,

I just found this statement over the internet. Can you please confirm on this?

"The base unit of measure recorded in the material master record is always used for the withdrawal quantity."

If that is the case, then our issue can be resolved if we just add BOT in APO and have BOT <-> CS conversion maintained in MAT1. Please confirm. Thank you in advance.

Really looking forward with your assistance.