cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Shipment costs doc error

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hai friends,

I have gone through the website for the following issue but iam unable to find the solution for this.Can u people help me out how to solve this issue

and because of this issue iam unable to determine net value as it is showing "0" In  "VI01"

What you do you mean by "Earmarked Funds"?

G/L account 5000000 cannot be used (please correct)

Message no. ME045

Diagnosis

Comparison of the field selection strings from the G/L account 5000000 and the account assignment category K reveals that there is an incompatible combination of field selections for the field selection group 'Earmarked Funds'.

The G/L account field selection is stored in table T004F; that for the account assignment is stored in table T162K.

Procedure

Please enter a correct G/L account.

With regards,

A.Sudhakar

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (6)

Answers (6)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks friends i made all the possibilities to solve but

Still iam getting the same error.I checked through the path in Vt01n or Vi01 Edit-log- shipment costs-G/L account 5000000 cannot be used (please correct)

1) In VT01n shipping route the field has been disabled it is not showing the route but the route is showing in sales order and delivery

2) In VI01 my departure point it is showing "Shipping Point" instead of departure point

3)) My net value it is showing as "0" as iam unable to forward to do MIRO with reference to shipment cost doc

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Check the following notes:-

  • Note 89897 - ME21 EME045 G/L account cannot be used
  • Note 95545 - ME21 w.new accnt assigmnt category:error mess.ME045

G. Lakshmipathi

former_member191939
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sudhakar,

Please see the below screen shot.

As per your screen shot you are looking only page 1 of page 4,please press page down key of your key board and then you will surely get  "ENMARKED FUNDS".

Regards

Eugene

Regards

Eugene

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear ranu and narendra,

                                    I have gone through the information which u people provided after checking all the fields and in"OBC4" iam not getting "EARMARKED FUNDS"field  Can u tell me how it is to apply

former_member184065
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

FYI,

Kindly see below screen shot with red mark.

Thanks,

Naren

former_member184065
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

First of all ,see your Shipment Item category details in t.code T_56 .This is because ,if you are using acc.categry K-cost center then your G/L account will be created as cost center in KS01 and before see how your G/L account has created and with what settings ( pls take help from FI guy on this).

Thanks,

Naren

former_member191939
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Sudhakar,

Text Removed

Please re-check the following:

Adjust the field status definition of table T162K to the field selection

in Financial Accounting (table T004F). Proceed as follows:

1. Determine the item of the field in question in the field selection

   string. You obtain this information from table TMODU, in the 'MODIF'

   column in transaction SE16.

2. Edit table T162K using transaction SM31 and change the position of

   the field status definition in question. An optional entry '.' might

   be a good starting point in many cases.

Or better

Please, kindly try this:

.- In transaction FS03 check for the relevant G/L account number  and the relevant

   Company Code, the Field Status Group (under the tab for 'Create /

   bank / interest').

.- For this Field Status Group and Company Code check the customizing

   transaction OBC4.

   Under the 'Additional account assignments' group see the setting

   maintained.

.- Now check with OME9 for your account assignment category 'K'

Are these two settings the same ones? Just in case, please set both of

them to 'Optional' and re-test the system behavior afterwards.

I hope this helps you.

Regards

Eugene

Message was edited by: G Lakshmipathi

Copy pasting from other source is not allowed here.  Your first para was copy pasted from OSS note and hence, it has been removed.  Instead, you could have provided the note reference here