on 10-15-2013 4:30 PM
Hi QM Experts,
I have a question on posting of Skip Lots. Gone thru many threads, but failed to find the complete details.
Question:
Thanks in advance
Surya
Dear Surya,
You can do the settings in SPRO, under inspection lot completion, Plan automatic usage decision, Select your plant and go to details and goto tab inspection lot completion, Under Automatic Usage Decision, Set "0" in the slot given for delay time for skip lot.
Check and revert.
Regards
Neelima
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thank you, Neelima
I maintained this config and posted the document. It posted 101 document with stock type 'Q' and immediately posted a 321 document also in no time. So technically stock is moved out of quality in no time. In nut shell, the material document still have 'Q'. This is a issue for me.
Alternatively, I tried maintaining material master Inspection Setup with Inspection type characteristic 'Control Inspection Lot' as 'For each Material Document item', then the stock posting is made to 'UR' instead of Quality. If this setting is maintained as 'for each material document, material, batch, and storage location' then it is posting to 'Quality'
Do you know any adverse impacts of this change or the exact business purpose of this setting?
Thanks
Surya
Hi Surya, why it is really needed to have stock type as unrestricted for SKIP lots though it is getting posted from QI to unrestricted in no time? This would let us to alternative solution if any!
I would rather recommend to keep this duration as 2 to 4 hour at least. Reasons,
As per my knowledge it is not feasible to post the stock in unrestricted for SKIP lots if you change control of inspection lot creation in material master.
Regards, Anand
If you are testing using "each material document item", and doing multiple receipts using the same PO and item number, you won't get any new inspection lots.
For "each material document, material, batch, and storage location" you might be getting new inspection lots because you are receiving the material in as a new batch each time.
Using the "each material document item" as you did won't influence or change your skip lot procedures. I.e. if you make one large purchase order and receive in daily bulk deliveries, after the first receipt, you won't get any more inspection lots and it has nothing to do with your skip lot procedures at all.
Craig
Thank you, Craig
When I posted the documents with setting as 'each material document item' also it is creating the inspection lot for each material receipt for the same PO line item. So based on my testing, I guess this is what is happening:
With each material document item, system creates one (separate) inspection lot for each material document line item. So in a GR if I post 2 line items for the same material then it creates 2 separate lots.
In the each material document, material, batch and storage location, system creates separate inspection lot for each change of the above parameter. Meaning, if I post two lines in GR for a material with same batch to same storage location then it creates single inspection lot. If a new batch comes in the same GR then a separate inspection lot gets created.
I agree that this is nothing to do with skip lot but strangely it is posting to UR stock if the setting is 'each material document item'. Not sure why this behavior.
Thanks
Surya
Thank you, Anand
I agree with you comments. But what happens in large warehouses is posting to inspection lot in GR document triggers label printings and subsequent warehouse movements say TO creation if WM is used.Typically the warehouse movements are triggered in system immediately after GR postings to avoid additional transactions or business interference to perform the transactions.
This might results in un-necessary movements in warehouse from receiving dock to quality area and then again to regular bins area. This is a costly labor effort.
So business should strike a balance between the additional warehouse movements vs feasibility to do disposition if they choose to do inspection or adjust the in-process rejections.
Hope you agree with this
Thanks
Surya
This message was moderated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This message was moderated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.