on 09-25-2013 3:03 PM
Dear Techies,
I got struck with Spam Upgrade SAPKD70150 from SAPKD70145....stopped at phase of DISASSEMBLE,
and getting DUMP CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND.... and its showing First import SPAM/SAINT update SAPKD70150 completely
Actually we run this in Dev successfully but unable to run in quality because of we transported one TR in to QAS...now we are unable to revert back that TR.... pls suggest in urgent !!!
Here system details
Non unicode system
SAP VERSION 701
AIX 6.1
oracle 10g
kernel 701 patch level 150. tp and r3trans updated.....
Thanks& Regards
RAZZ R
Well, can you post the dump?... you can try to send in a new transport with the corrections (whatever they are) using tp import command at OS level.
Regards, Juan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Juan,
Thanks Juan for your quick reply...pls find below the dump....and pls suggest which transport request needs to transport to correct the errors...
Short text | ||||||||
Function module "OCS_CHECK_NAMING_CONVENTION" not found. | ||||||||
What happened? | ||||||||
The function module "OCS_CHECK_NAMING_CONVENTION" is called, | ||||||||
but cannot be found in the library. | ||||||||
Error in the ABAP Application Program | ||||||||
The current ABAP program "SAPLOCS_CORE" had to be terminated because it has | ||||||||
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed. | ||||||||
What can you do? | ||||||||
Note down which actions and inputs caused the error. | ||||||||
To process the problem further, contact you SAP system | ||||||||
administrator. | ||||||||
Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look | ||||||||
at and manage termination messages, and you can also | ||||||||
keep them for a long time. | ||||||||
Error analysis | ||||||||
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below. | ||||||||
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC', was | ||||||||
not caught in | ||||||||
procedure "OCS_PATCH_DISASSEMBLER" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a | ||||||||
RAISING clause. | ||||||||
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the | ||||||||
exception would occur, the current program is terminated. | ||||||||
The reason for the exception is: | ||||||||
The program "SAPLOCS_CORE" contains the CALL FUNCTION statement. | ||||||||
The name of the function module to be called is "OCS_CHECK_NAMING_CONVENTION". | ||||||||
No function module exists with the name "OCS_CHECK_NAMING_CONVENTION". | ||||||||
All function modules are listed in the Function Library (SE37). | ||||||||
- | ||||||||
Possible reasons: | ||||||||
a) Wrong name specified. Pay particular attention to | ||||||||
upper/lower case and underscores ("_"). | ||||||||
or | ||||||||
b) Transport error | ||||||||
c) In the case of an enqueue/dequeue module, | ||||||||
the lock object may not have been activated | ||||||||
(ABAP/4 Dictionary). | ||||||||
How to correct the error | ||||||||
Check the last transports to the SAP System. | ||||||||
Is the program "SAPLOCS_CORE" currently being changed? | ||||||||
If an enqueue/dequeue module is involved, is the activation | ||||||||
of the lock object missing in the ABAP/4 Dictionary? | ||||||||
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to | ||||||||
find an interim solution in an SAP Note. | ||||||||
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following | ||||||||
keywords: | ||||||||
CALL_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND "CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FUNC" | ||||||||
SAPLOCS_CORE or "LOCS_COREU40" | ||||||||
OCS_PATCH_DISASSEMBLER | ||||||||
Function modules with names similar to "OCS_CHECK_NAMING_CONVENTION": | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_COMPONENT | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_MAINTENANCE_CERT | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_COMPONENT_PATCH | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_DECLARATION | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_ADD_ON | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_LOCKED_COMPONENT | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_RUNNING_UPGRADE_4_NA | ||||||||
OTC_INTEREST_CONVERSION_CHECK | ||||||||
OXT_TASK_CONVERSION_CHECK | ||||||||
OCS_CHECK_NOTE_CORR_UPG | ||||||||
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error | ||||||||
notification to SAP, include the following information: | ||||||||
1. The description of the current problem (short dump) | ||||||||
To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File | ||||||||
(Unconverted)". | ||||||||
2. Corresponding system log | ||||||||
Display the system log by calling transaction SM21. | ||||||||
Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes | ||||||||
after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File | ||||||||
(Unconverted)". | ||||||||
3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP | ||||||||
program: The source code of the program | ||||||||
In the editor, choose "Utilities->More | ||||||||
Utilities->Upload/Download->Download". | ||||||||
4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which | ||||||||
actions and input led to the error. | ||||||||
The exception must either be prevented, caught within proedure | ||||||||
OCS_PATCH_DISASSEMBLER "(FUNCTION)", or its possible occurrence must be | ||||||||
declared in the | ||||||||
RAISING clause of the procedure. | ||||||||
To prevent the exception, note the following: |
Thanks&Regards
RZZ
Dear Juan,
Absolutely right you are,
when we upgraded SPAM Level 45 to 47 after that we applied SNOTE 1778145 (created one workbench request) , but in QAS we done mistake that we tranported that request before we upgrading spam level. The above note saying do not transport or dont apply note when spam level 45
I try to get resolve this with modifications but unable to do , so we made database restore and again started spam upgrade...its working fine now...
Thanks to all Techies for your Quick response..
Thanks&Regards
RAZZ
Hi,
If all your system are in same version and SP level, please try with SPAM in QA also.
I suspect system are not in sysnc.
Thanks
prabhakar...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
Have you tried to ignore it and restart the SP upgrade as par sap note 1293744?
Regards,
Vishal
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Rishi,
Please find below
SNOTE 1778145
Version 3
Processor
Processing Status In Process
Implement. Status Can be implemented
Language EN
Short Text 'UNKNOWN_ERROR' in phase Disassemble during SP import
Component BC-UPG-OCS-SPA Support Package Tools for ABAP
________________________________________________________________________
Long Text
Symptom
You import HR related Support Packages (for components SAP_HR, EA-HR, HR-CEE) and get
the error 'UNKNOWN_ERROR' in phase Disassemble. The action log show the error message:
"Internal error: No valid source context supplied"
Other terms
Support Package Manager, Add-On Installation Tool, SPAM, SAINT, UNKNOWN_ERROR
Reason and Prerequisites
This error is caused by a programming error; it may only occur during the import of HR
related Support Packages.
Solution
The error is fixed with SPAM/SAINT Version 0048.
As long as this SPAM/SAINT Version is not available, you can fix it by implementing
the attached correction instruction with the note Assistant. The note correction can
also be implemented while the Support Package queue with the HR Support Packages is
defined and stays in phase DISASSEMBLE. The Support Package Manager has to be started
anew after the correction was implemented!
Please be careful when transporting this note correction between systems with
different SPAM/SAINT Versions. For instance, transporting the function module
OCS_PATCH_DISASSEMBLER from a system with SPAM/SAINT Version 0046 (or higher) into a
system with SPAM/SAINT Version 0045 (or lower) will produce syntax errors in function
group OCS_CORE, so that the tools Support Package Manager and Add-On Installation Tool
does not work anymore. Do not do this!
Note the following: After you have imported SPAM/SAINT Version 0048, you can reset
the note to original in transaction SPAU or remove it from the modification browser
(transaction SE95). Ensure that no objects are changed when you remove the note. To do
this, deselect all objects in the traffic light dialog box.
________________________________________________________________________
we applied above note in Dev system n created a request , at that time spam updated successfully and now we tranported that request in Quality system, now its got strucked ....pls read above bold lines ...we have done this unfortunately....
____________________________________________________________________
Thanks®ards
Razz
Hi,
First of all i dont see any requirment to implement this note as the fix was provided in SPAM/SAINT 48. You are deploying SP50 so that makes the use of this note not valid for you.
Now can you please go in snote ->goto -> sap note browser.
give the name of the note and execute. Now select the same note and then
SAP NOTE -> Reset SAP note implemented.
I think that you might have to open the system to do that.
Once you have done it please try ti reimport SPAM/SAINT.
Thanks
Rishi Abrol
Hello
I got struck with Spam Upgrade SAPKD70150 from SAPKD70145....stopped at phase of DISASSEMBLE.
This is the problem
Please be careful when transporting this note correction between systems with different SPAM/SAINT Versions. For instance, transporting the function module OCS_PATCH_DISASSEMBLER from a system with SPAM/SAINT Version 0046 (or higher) into a system with SPAM/SAINT Version 0045 (or lower) will produce syntax errors in function group OCS_CORE, so that the tools Support Package Manager and Add-On Installation Tool does not work anymore. Do not do this!
If I were you I would try this:
Go to the development system and reset the SAP note and create a new transport request.
Release the transport request and import that into the quality.
Restart the SPAM update.
If that doesn't help then you probably need to reset the OCS queue and kick start the SPAM update again.
Regards
RB
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.