on 08-30-2013 11:07 AM
Hello,
I'd like some feedback on the following issue:
1 - I'm creating sales processes in which the Sold-to-Party partner is never the same account as the Payer;
2 - Assuming that all the data needed for the accounting comes from the company master record of the Payer, I decided not to maintain the company master data for the Sold-to-Party;
3 - When trying to release the invoice to accounting I get the following error message:
Message no. F5102
No master record was created in company code "1000" for customer number "1030100012".
System error.
Maintain the customer master record "1030100012" in company code "1000" or correct the account number.
My questions are:
A - Why does SAP need to fetch the company master record from the Sold-to-Party in this case?
B - Is there any chance of reaching a solution in which the company master record does not have to be maintained for the Sold-to-Party?
Regards,
João
Hi Joao,
Use XD01 to extend customer master. Input the company code ID and maintain data.
Or go to FD01 to maintain company code specific data.
Regards,
Sharan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Joao,
Try with option B in Branch/head office field for your billing type in VOFA.
Hello Karuna,
Thank you for your answer, I'm marking it as Correct Answer since it appears that the requirement is met.
Regards,
João
Glad to know your requirement is met
Hi Joao,
i think the problem is that standard SAP does not rely on your assumption.
2 - Assuming that all the data needed for the accounting comes from the company master record
BR
Robert
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi João,
thank you for your answer, I do not use to get too much answers when it has passed so long time from the post...
Yes I saw the maked answer and I tested. It work from the point of view of the error: the system didn't give the error anymore. But this solution issued other problem in accounting: the accounting document misses the branch at item level, the branch that contains the subsidiary (the sold-to) related to the payer.!!, which for us is very important .
Nevertheless, thank you very much.
José María Mateo
User | Count |
---|---|
107 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.