Error whilst creating an entry sheet in the backend system

[Former Member]

We've created a limit order with confirmation and we can successfully create the first confirmation without any problem.

When we try to enter a subsequent confirmation, we get the error "Error whilst creating an entry sheet in the backend system 5000000237 022 PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 1 AU : 1000".

Has anyone any ideas why this is happening?

Is it tolerances ? If so which keys should I maintain in both SRM and R/3.

Regards

Keith

[yann_bouillut · Accepted solution]

Hi Keith,

This is a backend error due to the lack of the unlimited flaf on item level.

Please read OSS note 338032.

Kind regards,

Yann

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Yann

How do I set this via SRM ?

Keith

[yann_bouillut · Accepted solution]

Hi,

You can use bbp_doc_change badi to set the unlimited flag in the PO (BUS2201)

Kind regards,

Yann

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Can this not be done any other way ?

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

I've checked the unlimited box when creating a limit order but this doesn't appear to make any difference.

[yann_bouillut · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Did you check the backend PO as well ? ))

Kind regards,

Yann

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

I can't as we're using ECS...

[yann_bouillut · Accepted solution]

Hi,

I mean in display mode : do you see the unlimited flag ?

Kind regards,

Yann

[yann_bouillut · Accepted solution]

Also please check that the final entry flag is not set.

kind regards,

Yann

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

The unlimited flag can be set and can be seen.

It's the flag on the delivery tab in the backend PO that needs to be checked.

I'm getting one of our developers to implement the BADI as we speak.

Thanks for your help.

Keith

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi

Check whether OSS notes 935538 has been implemented in R3 (or on R3 plug in SAPKIPZI5D). If yes, there is a corrective note 990264 to be implemented in SRM. We faced similar problems and these notes solved our problem.

Rgds

Reddy

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Reddy

Thanks for your reply. Note 990264 did indeed provide the fix.

Keith

[Former Member]

Added points