Adapters - Acknowledments ? Which ones?

[rodrigoalejandro_pertierr]

Hi,

i been wondering for a  long time and here i go.

I know that some adapters supports ACK by using ccBPM like files adapter, but

1. is there any way to request a transport ACK for adapters?
2. Is it possible to send it to the sender system?
3. Which adapters support this functionality and which ones dont?
4. for those that dont support it as standard, what alternative do i have?

I have theory about it but i never confirm what is really possible

Best regards

[marksmyth · Accepted solution]

Hello Rodrigo,

Check these links for more info on this:

1) Adapters

2) Acknowledgment Messages

Regards

Mark

[former_member190624]

Hi,

SEEBURGER AS2 Adapter will support both synchronous and synchronous MDN's(Message delivery notification) .

For SAP Adapters Ambrish already mentioned above .

Regards

Hari.

[ambrish_mishra]

Hi,

By transport acknowledgement, do you mean acknowledgment from the transport layer.

AFAIK, only system or application acknowledgments are possible and that doesn't seem to have changed.

Is it a requirement you are facing or is it just for your information?

Ambrish

[rodrigoalejandro_pertierr]

transport ack (comunication channel)

i dont have a current requirement, just information.

[ambrish_mishra]

Hi,

File adapter supports system acknowledgement request.  Application acknowledgements are not supported.

SOAP adapter and JDBC adapter work synchronously so acknowledgments (or response) are implicitly supported.

You are already aware of IDoc adapter which supports acknowledgements explicitly through ALEAUD.

MDM PI adapter provides two levels of acknowledgements when requested.

JMS adapters supports system acknowledgement whether a message has been successfully written to a queue.

>>>>>>is there any way to request a transport ACK for adapters?

     No

>>>>>>Is it possible to send it to the sender system?

     Depends on the adapter and solution

>>>>>>Which adapters support this functionality and which ones dont?

     Depends on the details above

>>>>>>for those that dont support it as standard, what alternative do i have?

By standards, things work like above but custom solutions are always possible like ALEAUD for example.

Hope it helps!

Ambrish

[rodrigoalejandro_pertierr]

thanks for your aswer, maybe i explained bad my question.

PI HEADER MESSAGE
• The stations through which the message is forwarded are logged under
HopList. In the case of asynchronous processing acknowledgments, the
HopList ensures that responses are sent back to the original sender.

To send the ACK to the client system, first all, the client should request for ACK, if not the ACK will never reach the client rigth??

Acknowledgments are not listed as messages themselves in the monitor, but
as a part of the actual message in the detail view. In the MAIN area there is
the <SAP:MessageClass> tag with either the SystemAck or ApplicationAck
entry.

What about if the client cannot request for an ACK, is there any way to get the PI ACK and map it to another structure? I ASSUME THAT IT NOT POSSIBLE COZ THE QUOTE BEFORE

if the parameter  ACK_SYSTEM_FAILURE is set in the SXMB_ADM-->Integration Engine configuration: is possible to define which ASYNC channel should return and ACK or no matter which one every ASYNC channel will  will return and ack?

Regards

Rodrigo

[ambrish_mishra]

Mark already guided you to useful links.