on 07-25-2013 10:00 AM
Hi friends,
In the Sales order & Invoice the customer code 'X' is used as Sold to Party, Bill to Party, Payer.
In the customer master against this customer 'X' Head Office is maintained as 'Y'.
The accounting document is posted against the Head Office 'Y' even though the Head Office 'Y' is not extended to the Sales area in which the invoice has been created.
Can someone please explain this in the Head Office / Branch concept.
Is it not necessary for the Head Office to be extended to the Sales Area ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Uday
Hello,
sorry but the question is not cler.
In customizing of billing type, transacction VOFA, there is the field Branch/Head office with these possible values:
o initial : If the payer is different to the sold-to party, the payer
is transferred to Financial Accounting as the customer and the
sold-to party as the branch. Any branch/head office relationship
stored in FI is ignored.
o A : The sold-to party is forwarded as the customer. Any branch/head
office relationship stored in FI for this customer is taken into
account.
o B : The payer is forwarded as the customer. Any branch/head office
relationship stored in FI for this customer is taken into account.
This is how Branch/Head office is handled in SD-FI interface.
Best regards,
Ivano.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ivano,
Thanks for the reply.
My question was related to the Customer masters of Head Office and Branch.
It is known that both the Head Office and Branch should be from the same company code. My question is, is it not necessary that the Head Office should be extended to the Sales Area in which the transaction is being carried out ?
Hope I have clarified my question.
Regards,
Udaynath
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.