on 03-07-2007 3:01 PM
Hi,
I have a number of IDOCS that are sent from a WAS6.40 system using a qRFC queue. These IDOCS are then sent to a number of receivers and inbound interfaces.
A large number of the receivers are file adapters for which I would like to be able to disable the EOIO handling.
Is there anyway to amend the quality of service?
Regards
Ian
Hi,
I have checked and this system is setting this field correctly according to the documentation.
I need to re-iterate that the integration server seems to be processing these messages as EO but the file adapter is still using EOIO.
Regards
Ian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I can see the Exactly once in order via the runtime workbench, I also simulated an error and could see my messages were going into 'Holding' status.
This is affecting the scenario because if I have an error with one message then all messages end up in a 'Holding' status.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ian,
I was trying to check your scenario and ran into something that has really confused me...
The table on Xi which holds the interface determination s entries is SMPPREL3, now if you check the field QUALITY, its description says ...
<i><b>Processing Sequence ('X' = EO, SPACE = EOIO)</b></i>
and this field should correspond to 'maintain order at runtime' property of interface determination...
usually with ABAP "X" means selected and space means 'not selected'....
now can you see in this table for your particular entry and the value in this field....if it is space or 'X'....
May be this is just a "typo" by whoever created the table
Thanks,
Renjith
bump
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I have checked both of these.
My requirement is to force the file adapter to ignore the exactly once in order processing and use exactly once instead.
many thanks
Ian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Anyone?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI,
I do not have an acknowledgement level sent in the send step.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Good question, the reason for this is one of the interfaces does require exactly once in order handling (we are passing these IDOCS to a BPM). It is only where the IDOCS is passed to a file adapter that I do not want EOIO handling.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I have tried this but the file adapter still treats it as EOIO. This surprised me as the integration server was processing it as if it was EO.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
In the interface determination you can switch off/deselect the 'Maintain order at Runtime' option and this would make your QoS to EO instead of EOIO..
Thanks,
Renjith
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
In your Interface Determination, have you selected the option, <b>Maintain Interafce Order at Runtime</b>? If yes, deslect this option and the EOIO setting will get turned off.
Regards
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.