on 07-10-2013 11:44 AM
Hi,
I have a new scenario of File -> Idoc
-> File
Here Source file (# separated) will be like that -
1#a1#a2#a3#a4
1#a1#a2#a3#a4
1#a1#a2#a3#a4
9#3
For this I have done a multi-mapping -
But when the source file is picked up through communication channel its creating an additional tag <Recordset> , that's why giving an mapping error -
Please give any suggestion to remove this extra tag
Hello,
Try this in ur FCC:
ignoreRecordsetName = true
Thanks
Amit Srivastava
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
The splitting problem is solved now .
But the problem is that as in target side I have used two different adapters (Idoc and File) , Its not working .
In spite of normal Idoc adapter I have used Idoc_AAE adapter provided in PI 7.3.
But now the problem is that its not creating any idoc in the target side for the correct file .
Hi Appu,
Now the problem is that as we are running the interface it not showing any error in the sxmb_moni , but it is not creating any idoc in receiver side.
Take the payload from sxmb_moni.
Test this in the message mapping.
See if you get the required idoc output message.
it this is producing correct output. then check the receiver idoc adapter channel.
message is successful here then you need to check in the ECC side.
Hope this helps you..
Regards,
Muniyappan.
Hi ,
Cross check your message mapping again , whether you mapped all parent nodes (Idoc) or not .
Regards
Hari.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Apu,
Did you put 'RecordSet' as RecordSet Name in your File adapter configuration? Try ignoring that part, I think that is optional part in File adapter configuration.
/AB
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
>>>>But when the source file is picked up through communication channel its creating an additional tag <Recordset>
you cannot remove the recordset structure
quickest solution:
update your data type with recordset node
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.