on 07-08-2013 10:37 PM
Hello experts,
We have this function given to us by our compliance team and we need to implement it in GRC.
Currently they are using a custom tool for checking conflicts but now with us implementing GRC 10 they want to migrate over.
We are able to migrate some functions pretty easily but have issue with this one function.
I am attaching a doc with all inputs and any inputs are appreciated.
Also couple of q's about building functions.
1 .We have cross system/single system.What is the purpose of this i.e. can this function be used for any system even though we define action per system in a function
Hi Uday,
I will try to explain the conccept of the single and cross system with an example. Suppose you have two functions,Fun1 and Fun2.
Fun1 has the following action
Connector action
ABC SU01
DEF MM01
and the Fun2 has the following actions
Connector action
ABC PFCG
DEF MM02
Both this functions are part of the risk Risk1.Now if the scope is Single system then the action
rules generated for the Risk1 would be
Rule ID Connector Action
0001 ABC SU01
0001 ABC PFCG
0002 DEF MM01
0002 DEF MM02
In case of single system the rules will be generated corrosponding to the same system .i.e. A rule will be created for the system ABC(0001) and a rule will be created for the system DEF(0002).
In case of cross system the above mentioned rules will be generated and apart from that the rules
corrosponding to the cross system will also get generated.
Rule ID Connector Action
0001 ABC SU01
0001 ABC PFCG
0002 DEF MM01
0002 DEF MM02
0003 ABC SU01
0003 DEF MM01
0004 ABC SU01
0004 DEF MM02
0005 ABC PFCG
0005 DEF MM01
0006 ABC PFCG
0006 DEF MM02
I hope this will help you understand the difference between single and cross system risk.
Thanks & Regards
Japneet Singh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.