on 07-02-2013 11:09 AM
Dear all,
I have a confusion. When I check the table "J_1IEXCDTL" it shows me Excise Year as 2013. However, it should be 2012 as user is punching previous year data. In "J_1IGRXREF" too it is showing 2013. Now, I understand that if both year are same system will bring the amount to MIRO. MIRO is done and is showing excise details. If I extract data for 2012, the amount is showing in the Register for 2012 only. In Case 1 and 2, during Invoice Excise is captured and showing in registers too.
What is the significance of the Excise Year then? Should all these be cancelled and re-captured?
For Case 3: Excise Year in both the tables are different in this case excise is not showing during MIRO. I hope we need to reverse the part 2 here.
For Case 4& 5: Excise Year is different in both the tables but system is picking Excise during MIRO.
Please open the attachment while you read this,
Regards,
Lakhya
Hi,
For this already created document, you need to correct the data in table J_1IGRXREF based on the
data in J_1IEXCDTL table.
This can be done vis SE16 is debug mode or with the help of Z pgm.
Pls apply the below notes to avoid such problems in future.
1706543
1724203
1581590
1876209
1609084
Regards,
Rajasree R
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Rajasree and Ashok for your continuous support. Appreciate it.
Currently entries are made for 2012 only.
Rajasree, there are two docs in Excise year 2013 (should be 2012) in J_1IEXCDTL. I have kept the same year as 2013 for J_1IGRXREF too. But my only concern is whether keeping the Excise year 2013 have any impact? Client does not want the Excise Year as 2013 for data entered for year 2012 not 2013.
Regards,
Thanks Ashok. I have gone through the note. Also raised this concern. I believe this note is applicable 1706543. But my concern is which way to go for the incorrect excise year. Should we make changes to these table directly and match them. J_1IEXCDTL, J_1IGRXREF
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please go through SAP note 1710179..
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
89 | |
7 | |
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.