cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MM- CIN - Custom Clearing Account getting hit in J1IEX Excise Posting (Part II)

raven_sap
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello All,

We are trying to post Part II of Excise for a domestic purchase case, however the custom clearing account is getting hit instead of Cenvat clearing. Refer refer Entries below:

G/L Account          Description                             Debit/Credit               Amount

280200                CEN REC 23A BED P002           S Debit                     117,769.58

280203                RG23A PART II - ECS                S Debit                      3,533.08

170120                CUSTOMS CLRG                      H Credit                     121,302.66

__________ ____________________ _ ________________

I have checked the G/L accounts assigned for GRPO transaction and all of them are correct. Please help. This is an urgent issue.

R.Bhatia

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

former_member187965
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

In domestic procurement, system picks cenvat clearing account assigned to GRPO by following config path,

SPRO - Logistics General - Tax on Goods Movements - India - Account Determination - Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction

Here, if you have assigned same account (170120) then system is picking correct account. Check the description of the account.

Here, if you have assigned different cenvat clearing account then pls upload screenshot of PO taxes, account determination config, J1IEX simulation.

former_member192897
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Are you facing this problem for a Particular Purchase order GRN? Is it first time? Check the GL account assigned in the account determination. Also ensure you have selected the GRPO with no sub transaction type.

raven_sap
Explorer
0 Kudos

Hello Ashok,

Thanks for the reply. We are facing issue only for a particular PO. For rest of the cases its working fine. The transaction is GRPO only and there is no subtransaction type. G/L accounts are also correct.

Regards,

R. Bhatia

former_member192897
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

If you are getting the Part II entries perfectly for another PO then you should get the same entry for this PO also. In that case there should not be any problem with your account determination as you are sure account determination is perfect and there is no sub transaction type used.

Check whether any changes are made to the GL account 170120. Especially description..