on 05-28-2013 10:34 AM
Dear All,
my requirement is POD check has to be done as per the incoterm but not for the Ship to party at the Delivery .incoterms have to be maintained in a Z table .system has to pick up the incoterm from the table and POD check has to be done.
standard check has to be deactivated (from Ship to and Delivery item category level)
please help me how to met this requirement , whether it can be done through user exit or any kind of enhancement is required for this.
regards
santosh
Hi Santosh,
I guess you can incorporate the code for your requirment in the item copying control routines. There based on your Z table input the relevance for POD can be set .
Please try and share the result with forum.
Thanks and Regards,
Atulkumar Dagade
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Santosh,
As the requirement is not standard, obviously you will have to apply a User Exit / Enhancement here.
Now, when the POD check to be done? At time of creating Invoice? If yes, then you will have to insert a ABAP code in a User exit in Program - RV60AFZZ which will check the incoterm from the Z-Table & do the needful.
By the way, on what basis the incoterms be picked from Z-Table?
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hI,
You have to use user exit to develop this
Check
V50S0001
regards,
santosh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear,
1.May I know ,why POD has to be checked as per Incoterm only ?
2. Would mind,can you share your business requirement ?
POD status Field is present in Delivery Header at Processing Tab .So,come to the point is ,POD is status then how POD check will be done as per based on Incoterm ?
Note : When you complete the Delivery then you need to take that Delivery number and keep time and date and confirm that Delivery Number in VLPODQ transaction .
Thanks,
Naren
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.