on 05-21-2013 1:17 PM
Hi All,
I have changed a pricing procedure where a GL Account was assigned to both account key and accruals which were assigned to the condition type ZCO2 where the accrual checkbox is ticked.
Now as per requirement the account keys have been removed from the pricing procedure and the GL assignment against the account key and accrual has been removed and the condition type has been marked as statistical.
During billing the system is showing accounting determination error and Account Determination Analysis-Revenue Accounts I find that No GL could be determined against condition type ZCO2.
Am I missing out on anything.How to resolve this issue.
Please help.
Hi,
I had merely copied ZCO2 and renamed it as ZCO3.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
As you said that when you created new Pricing Procedure with with another cond. type ZCO3 it worked. Now is your New and Old pricing procedure are exactly identical in terms of settings?
Also try and replace ZCO2 with ZCO3 in your old pricing procedure and test, if it works then I guess you should check the settings of Condition Type ZCO2 comparing with ZCO3 if you had missed out on some setting.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi All,
I have created a new pricing procedure and assigned the condition type ZCO3 and made it to statistical and it is working.
I am not sure though but I think a condition type to which a GL is assigned via an account key cannot be made statistical although I do not know why ??
Can someone please shed some light on this??
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
SAURAV MALLICK wrote:
Hi All,
I am not sure though but I think a condition type to which a GL is assigned via an account key cannot be made statistical although I do not know why ??
Can someone please shed some light on this??
Hi,
Have you removed Account key for ZC03 condition type in your old pricing procedure and checked for statisctical mark?
Regards,
Sai Krishna.
Hi All,
I have created new sales order,delivery and billing and the problem persists.
Please help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The sales order/delivery referenced by that billing document might have been created before you made the changes in the pricing procedure. So as Sai mentioned, try to create a new sales order/delivery/billing document and check again.
For other open sales order, try to do mass update in t.code VA05 (you can search the forum on this details) and then try to create billing documents.
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Can you try creating fresh order-Del- billing and see. If you sill get this error, you can try keeping valid to date as the past date in condition records and create fresh condition record with the same value. After this you can again try creating orders and then billing.
Let us know the results.
Regards, Sai Krishna.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear,
During billing the system is showing accounting determination error and Account Determination Analysis-Revenue Accounts I find that No GL could be determined against condition type ZCO2.
If you have any another requirement then you need create another pricing procedure for that until and unless should not delete that settings already present in the pricing procedure with processing G/L accounts .
My suggestion is create new Pricing procedure and assign what settings you deleted to old pricing procedure .
If you have any doubts please let me know .
Thanks,
Naren
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
99 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.