cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Stack file is invalid: component 'ST-A/PI' (stack release 01P_700 < source release 01Q_700)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello community;

Situation :

Solution Manager 7.0 sps30 (ready for upgrade) with this note applied

Note 69455 - Servicetools for Applications ST-A/PI (ST14, RTCCTOOL, ST12) :

(ST-A/PI upgraded from 01P to 01Q) due to this remark 

Note: As of 11th Feb 2013 a new addon version 01Q* of addon ST-A/PI has become available.

The older 01P* version is still sufficient for service preparation until 10th March 2013.)

Next through MOPZ (upgrade this SSM system from 7.0 to 7.1) stack XML was successfully generated (download basket downloaded etc)

Now I'm running SUM (sp 7), in phase 5.3 configuration, and am encountering this error message (from EHP_INCLUSION)

4 ETQ399 ... Stack component ST-A/PI, 01P_700

1EETQ399 Last error code set is 'Stack file is invalid: component 'ST-A/PI' (stack release 01P_700 < source release 01Q_700)

Any clues ?

Kind regards;

Ben ten Thije

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member189797
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Dear Ben,

Could you please provide me the following information :

1. What is current ST-A/PI version in the system (System --> Status)

2. What is the source version of ST-A/PI detected in the stack.xml

3. What is the target version of ST-A/PI detected in the stack.xml

Regards,

Gaurav

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Gaurav;

1. Current version is 01Q_700 / 0000

2 and 3 :

Initial state :

      - <software-component-entry>

     <caption>ST-A/PI 01Q_700</caption>

     <name>ST-A/PI</name>

     <version>01Q_700</version>

     <vendor>sap.com</vendor>

     <ppms-number>67837800100200023640</ppms-number>

     <sp-level>0</sp-level>

     <patch-level>0</patch-level>

     <runtime-type>ABAP</runtime-type>

   </software-component-entry>

   </initial-state>

SP-feature stack

      - <software-component>

     <caption>ST-A/PI 01P_700</caption>

     <ppms-number>67837800100200021707</ppms-number>

     <runtime-type>ABAP</runtime-type>

     <name>ST-A/PI</name>

     <version>01P_700</version>

     <vendor>sap.com</vendor>

      - <archives>

     <archive-name abap-delivery-transport="SAPKITAB7I">KITAB7I.SAR</archive-        name>

  </archives>

</software-component>

</sp-feature-stack>


    Kind regards;

    Ben ten Thije


Former Member
0 Kudos

Issue solved (check bypassed)

igor_taratutin
Explorer
0 Kudos

How did you bypass this check? I have exactly the same situation.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Igor;

In the genrated stack XML I changed (with a XML editor) this (entries in red/bold in SP-feature stack)

         Initial state :

     

                         - <software-component-entry>

                    <caption>ST-A/PI 01Q_700</caption>

                    <name>ST-A/PI</name>

                    <version>01Q_700</version>

                    <vendor>sap.com</vendor>

                    <ppms-number>67837800100200023640</ppms-number>

                    <sp-level>0</sp-level>

                    <patch-level>0</patch-level>

                    <runtime-type>ABAP</runtime-type>

                </software-component-entry>

                </initial-state>

            SP-feature stack

                         - <software-component>

                    <caption>ST-A/PI 01Q_700</caption>

                    <ppms-number>67837800100200023640</ppms-number>

                    <runtime-type>ABAP</runtime-type>

                    <name>ST-A/PI</name>

                    <version>01Q_700</version>

                    <vendor>sap.com</vendor>

               - <archives>

                    <archive-name abap-delivery-transport="SAPKITAB7J">KITAB7J.SAR</archive-name>

            </archives>

            </software-component>

            </sp-feature-stack>

    

     Kind regards;

     Ben


Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Ben, first of all, thanks for the help. I have 2 quick questions:

1. Where do you get that "initial state" xml code from?

2. Where would you get the ppms-number for 01Q_700  if you didn't have that initial-state xml?

Thanks,

JP.