on 04-24-2013 2:41 PM
Hello All,
I develop a z report for wbs detail as similar to s_alr_87013558, i m gatting the correct actual value for some wbs ,and not correct for some,
M selecting wtgbtr from COEP by passing -prps-objnr,lednr = '00' and wrttp = ' 4',beknz =''s'.
my problem is in a same project the actual value is comming correct for few wbs and its behave different for another 1.my my dev system the actual value is not present in rpsco table also. if a check the table menually for correct value i need to pass -prps-objnr,lednr = '00' and wrttp = ' 4',vrgng-'coin'.
Please help me in selecting the actual value ,may b m not passing the correct value in where condition.
where condition prps-objnr,lednr = '00' and wrttp = ' 4',beknz =''s'.
Hello All,
How to capture the commitment value of PR ,in my zreport the value is populating after po but if only PR exit no commitment value
may b rpsco wrttp with 21 help me suggest some ideas.
Thanks,
sam
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Sam,
In table RPSCO with value type 21, enter object number of WBS.
Also go through below wiki on commitment
Commitments in Purchasing - ERP SCM - SCN Wiki
Regards
Tushar
Hi sam,
Try This,
In PRPS table PASS your WBS Element and get the OBJNR number .
Pass that OBJNR number in COSP table along with Valuation Type will be '4' and BELTP value should be 1. Get the SUM of values.
Now again go to AFVC table pass the WBS Element get the OBJNR number. Pass this number in COEP table with valuation type will be '4'. based upon your business process pass the business transaction type will be " COIN", now sum up this and above one you will get the exact result.
Revert to me if you have any query.
Regds
Srikumar. S
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Srikumar,
i m passing beknz = 'A',lendr ='00' and objnr '' to coep table ,for now in dev the value are coming correct,lets wait for the user testing ,its working fine as i test almost 35 cases hope 4 the best and thanks for the replay 2 all vary soon i ll close this thread as closed if my selection is work ,if any problem come i ll definitly ask u people and also after uat i ll share all the detail about the selection
Thanks,
Sam
Check in RPSCO master table for project accounting info and compare with COEP table.
Regards,
Sanjeev
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Mahendra and VR,
my client wnat a z simple report for this purpose,i know developing a report in report painter is bit eassy ,then developing a custo z one,as m a tech consultent i have less idea about report painter,so please help me and guide me to develope a report painter for this purpose,i study different document for report painter ,but still not comfortable in report painter,help me if u have some idea,.i resolve the issue by passing beknz = 'A',lendr ='00' and objnr ''
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
This is due to the inconsistency in the budget commitment tables.
So try to run the belo wmentione correction programmes:
RKACOR04 : Adjustments Between Line Items and Total Records ( Act Cost+ Commitment )
RAKNBU01 : Transfer Purchase Requisitions and Purchase Order Commitments.
followed by CJEN and CJBN .
So this will help you , to update & line up the missed data in COEP table for accurate cost of the project / wbs
Please reward , If its helpful to you.
Regards,
vrkumar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Not good idea to have Z report. Build a report painter which is more simple and reliable.
If not possible, then use the table COSS and COSP rather than COEP.
Regards,
Mahendra
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.