SAP for Public Sector Discussions
Foster conversations about citizen engagement, resource optimization, and service delivery improvements in the public sector using SAP.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FM It's essential to put in commitment item during PR

Former Member
0 Kudos

During PR(account assessment  category is P), We have to put in commitment item

but we didn't before upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 EHP 4

Is it upgrade problem within FM ?

Is there any way to just ignore that?

Thanks in advance

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

If you have FSM-FM activated and PR is updating FM in your update profile, then commitment item is necessary. You can create derivation rules (FMDERIVE) to fill this automatically based on document's parameters.


Regards,


Eli

View solution in original post

10 REPLIES 10

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

If you have FSM-FM activated and PR is updating FM in your update profile, then commitment item is necessary. You can create derivation rules (FMDERIVE) to fill this automatically based on document's parameters.


Regards,


Eli

Former Member
0 Kudos

I eliminated PR(value type 50) in update profile but It didn't work

Is It a upgrade issue? that's why It's ECC 6.0?

Regards,

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

How did you eliminate PR? Did you manually intervene in FMUP01 table?

Former Member
0 Kudos

nope

there's IMG setting

under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>general settings>Override update profile

and delete PR

am I doing something wrong?

Best Regards,

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

You can set it as 'statistical', but to delete via OF39 you wouldn't be able.

Former Member
0 Kudos

I set PR as statistical but It's not about this issue

that option only affect availability budget control

iklovski
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Of course, I know... My point is that you cannot simply delete 51 from the update profile (without modification in core table of FM). Just solve it with derivation rules as I suggested before.

Former Member
0 Kudos

yeah, I already did

thank you so much

Cheers,

Former Member
0 Kudos

yes, best to set derivation rules properly instead of deleting.

you can easily create a rule to set to dummy commitment item or whatever fits your business process flow..

0 Kudos

Yeah, I already set dummy commitment item in my derivation rules

but I just want to know any other way to set optional not essential to put commitment item during PR

cause I did at 4.7 version without any other setting now I'm using ECC 6.0 and occured this problem