on 03-31-2013 10:45 PM
Ran a SCCL on a system that had just been refreshed from PRD. The
client copy failed with all these error messages for each file.
Client copy was from 100 to 210 SAP_ALL profile, users from 100.
ECC6.0 , kernel 700 #309 on an IBM i v7r1
Never seen this one before. Anyone else?
Thanks
From SCC3 logs
WTYV_IMRG LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_BP1 IS-A-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_COND_ACCOUNT LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_FIELD_ATTR1 LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_OBJNR_INDEX LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_PARTNER_TAB LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_RCLHST LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WTY_RCLOBJ LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WVFB SD-POS DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WVFB2 SD-POS DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWKK LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWKP LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWKT LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWMI LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWMIT LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWMV LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WWVT LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT1 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT1T LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT2 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT2M LO DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT3 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT4 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT5 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
WYT6 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
ZACT_BREAKUP DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
ZACT_HEADER DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
ZDTC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)
Hi Matt,
Depending on the method of your refresh your systables might have become inconsistent. AS4FIXFILE is a tool to fix this. The default settings of the command should be good in this case.
Hope that helps.
Thomas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi , i think its database error.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please check this message: https://scn.sap.com/message/8758977
It refers to note 1248769. You might want to check.
Regards,
Yannick C.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.