cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SE14 errors after local client copy

MattJM
Explorer
0 Kudos

Ran a SCCL on a system that had just been refreshed from PRD. The

client copy failed with all these error messages for each file.


Client copy was from 100 to 210 SAP_ALL profile, users from 100.

ECC6.0 , kernel 700 #309 on an IBM i v7r1

Never seen this one before. Anyone else?

Thanks


From SCC3 logs

WTYV_IMRG LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_BP1 IS-A-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_COND_ACCOUNT LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_FIELD_ATTR1 LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_OBJNR_INDEX LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_PARTNER_TAB LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_RCLHST LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WTY_RCLOBJ LO-WTY DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WVFB SD-POS DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WVFB2 SD-POS DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWKK LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWKP LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWKT LO-MD-RPC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWMI LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWMIT LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWMV LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WWVT LO-MD-PC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT1 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT1T LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT2 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT2M LO DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT3 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT4 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT5 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

WYT6 LO-MD-BP-VM DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

ZACT_BREAKUP DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

ZACT_HEADER DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

ZDTC DB Inconsistency (See SE14)

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

0 Kudos

Hi Matt,

Depending on the method of your refresh your systables might have become inconsistent. AS4FIXFILE is a tool to fix this. The default settings of the command should be good in this case.

Hope that helps.

Thomas

bandal_amol
Explorer
0 Kudos

hi , i think its database error.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Please check this message: https://scn.sap.com/message/8758977

It refers to note 1248769. You might want to check.

Regards,

Yannick C.