MIGO reversal entry problem in funds management yearned activities

[Former Member]

Dear Tea,

We are doing FM year end activities we have the scenario like below

We entered and released budget of 75000 created PO for 25000 INR in FY 2012 and Done GR for 10000 INR after that through FMJ2 we transferred the po level commitment budget i.e. 15000 INR to FY 2013, now user came to know the GR which is done in FY 2012 is wrong so that he reverse the GR through MBST.

After commitment budget carry forward the report FMRP_RW_ BUDCON shows like below for FY 2012

Consumable budget	consumed budget	Available budget	Current budget
60000	10000	50000	60000

After commitment budget carry forward the report FMRP_RW_ BUDCON shows like below for FY 2013

Consumable budget	consumed budget	Available budget	Current budget
15000	15000	0	15000

After reversal of GR document in FY 2012 the budget report for FY 2012 is

Consumable budget	consumed budget	Available budget	Current budget
60000	0	60000	60000

After reversal of GR document in FY 2013 the budget report for FY 2013 is

Consumable budget	consumed budget	Available budget	Current budget
15000	25000	-10000	15000

Due to reversal of 10000 in FY 12 it is updating credit value FY 2013 and also it is increasing 2013 consumed value. Is this behavior is correct.

I am pretty much confused with the entry, kindly advice….

Regards,

Ravi.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Ravi

The behavior is correct, when u reverse the GR document after carry forward the open PO commitmentments, open PO commitments got increased to 25000/- the same will be reflected in budget reports. To avaoid this behavior it is suggestiable to reverse actuals before commitment carry forward.

Regards

Rao

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Dear Rao,

Thanks for your reply, But my concern is my GR is in FY 2012 and reversal also in FY 2012 but why system is updating credit value 10000 in FY 2013 how we have to justify the business and also 10000 amount negative is showing in available.

It is great if you elaborate the logic for entry....

Regards,

Ravi.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Ravi

This is a standard behavior, when ever you perform the Commitment Carry forward activity (FMJ2) any reversals posting in that year will be implicated in current financial year also, since the commitment carry forward is already done.  In your case open po commitment (15000) already carry forwarded to 2013, after that GR reversal is happened. Now GR reduction (amount type 200) will be impacted on 2013 fiscal year. since already commitment carry forward completed. Due to this consumed and available amount in 2012 will be changed, also consumed amount got increased in 2013 fiscal year.

Regards

Rao