on 03-20-2013 12:34 PM
Hello All,
My client has a requirement to calculate excise duty on price+ ammortization charges and again VAT should not be calculated with total inlusive of ammortization charges.
Base price = 98
Ammortization = 2
Basic Excise = 12
Ecess = 2
SEcess = 1
Now VAT % should be calculated on (98+12+2+1)
I have created Z condition type for ammortization charge using M/06, assigned it in M/08, used 6 as sub total
Base type in tax procedure for Excise duty condtion type is maintained as 363.
this process works fine when tax procedure is TAXINN, but it is not working when tax procedure is TAXINJ.
Please advise.
Hi,
Sorry for late reply. I was out of work and system.
Yes, you need to remove 362 and use subtotal 4. |This shold be explained in note as well.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi All,
The issue is resolved by using, subtotal 4 for ammortization condition type and adjusting its position in pricing.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
but it is not working when tax procedure is TAXINJ.
Have you have maintained "Excise Tax Rate" in J1ID ??
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Only for excise I need to consider Price + Ammortization
For VAT I dont want to consider Ammortization.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
yes 363 is already there for VAT condition type JIP5.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi
If I use sub total 4 for Ammoritzation condition type in MM pricing procedure, and suppose ammotization total is 2000
In BASB it is considering it as Price + 4000 as a base to calculate excise
Also While Calculating VAT again it considers 2000 from ammortization, which it should not.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Yes I have tried using 362 and 363.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Brinda,
Yes tried Note 352168 by using 362 for BASB and 363 for VAT condition type .
It didn't work.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello All,
Any one worked on same requirement for TAXINJ tax process?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You need to use cal type and routine in TAX procedure and pricing procedure to acheive this requirement.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Nilesh,
Can you please let me know exactly which cal type and which routine I neede to use in TAXINJ and for which condition types to achieve this.
I acutally tried using cal type 363, 362 to condition type JMO1 as Base Type. And also used 6 as subtotal for ammotization condition type in MM pricing procedure, but nothing worked so far, but same thing worked for other client with TAXINN process.
Find below current tax procedure.
Hi,
Read through the solution part of note- 352168 Alternate base value for sales tax calculation
Regards,
Brinda
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
moved to Internationalization and Unicode
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.