Does the location of Alternate Calculation Type 2 Matter?

[sanjay_ram]

Hi,

If i call the alternate calculation type 2 for the calculation of net value in 2 different places within the same pricing procedure, will it show 2 different values?

For example :-

Price : 200

Discount : 50

Net value 1 = 150 (Or Will it display 80 (200 - 50 - 70) here?)

Further Discount : 70

Net value 2 = Will it display 80 (200 - 50 - 70) here?

What i want to know is will the system compute KOMP-NETWR value only for all the condition types above it or it will compute based on all the condition types in a pricing procedure regardless of above or below?

[former_member184080 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Let me try to explain with the same example:

In your pricing procedure (Lets assume)

Step 10 : PR00

Step 20:  KA02

Step 30 - Net value -1

Step 40- K005

Step 50 - Net value 2

Condition records of VK11

PR00 - 100 INR

KA02 - 5%

K005 - 5 INR

Sales order with one line item - Qty1

PR00 - 100

Ka02 - 5% = 5 INR

Netvalue-1 = 95

K005 =  5 INR

Net Value 2 = 90 INR

Your net value 2 will be shown as your order line item net value = 90 INR

Its all depends on how you want display your net values (if you want to have different net value figures after some couple of discounts or you want to display one net value after calculating all discount values) It also, depends on business scenarios and pricing logic. There is no thumb rule that you have to follow exactly what i have mentioned in the example.

You can even maintain one Net value step after KA02 and K005.

At the end what is showing in your sales order - net value field (VBAP-NETWR) is important.

Hope its clear to you now,

Let me know if you need any further clarification.

Regards, Sai Krishna.

[former_member182378]

Sanjay,

1.

In the sales order, in Tab Conditions, you would be able to see two Net values (maybe three Net values).

Net value 1 = 150

Net value 2 = 80

The above two values can be seen in Tab Conditions.

In field VBAP-NETWR you / user would be able to see Net value.

2.

KOMP-NETWR shall consider all the conditions above it, for the calculation of the value of NETWR.

[sanjay_ram]

Thank you for all your replies, i really appreciate it, i got this confusion because no where it is documented that the KOMP-NETWR computation will only consider values ABOVE IT.

[former_member182378]

Sanjay,

These type of questions can be answered by testing in IDES.

Ofcourse, side-by-side you can put the question forward in the forum.

[former_member184065]

Dear,

Use Sub Total 1 and 2 to Carry over value to KOMP-KZWI1 and KZWI2 .

Why do you want two Net Values in Sales Order ? What is the use of this way ?

We have only one Net Value in Sales Order that is KOMP-NETWR ( VBAK and VBAP - NETWR )

In Sales Order , Finally we will be get Net Value without Taxes .So , you shouldnt get Net Value in another way . I dont think so .If you see  / observe Routine 2 then you can come to end without iffy .Routine 2 itself explain as without Taxes only not Discounts and Freight .

Kesari,

At the end what is showing in your sales order - net value field (VBEP-NETWR) is important.

Does VBEP having NETWR ?Can you read once again above comment and execute as it is in SAP and find out .

Thanks,

Naren

[former_member184080]

Hi Naren,

Tks for correcting my Typo. A small typing mistake can have somuch confusion.

Anyway, Could you please tell me why we can't have Net Value 1, 2 so on...

If we see standard SAP pricing procedure RVAA01, we have steps like Net value-1, 2,3. Its doesn't mean that we are taking them as actual net values. It may be for some information purpose or some other calculation purpose.

@Experts: Please correct me if i am wrong in my understanding.

Regards, Sai Krishna.

[former_member182378]

Kesari,

You are correct!

One additional point: In your previous post you write "VBAP-NETWR" but Narendra is talking about - you mentioning VBEP-NETWR; if you have edited your post (from VBEP to VBAP), then please write a note, explaining the change. This would make it clear for the readers.

[former_member184080]

Dear TW Sir,

Sorry for this. I will take of this from next time onwards. Anyway, I have mentioned in my subsequent post that There was a Type error

Regards, Sai Krishna.

[former_member182378]

Kesari,

You are an "active" contributor!

Many members read your posts and try to learn from them. I being one of them.

So, if you take care that there is minimal scope of confusion, it would be a great help.

Thank you for understanding!

[former_member184080]

Hi TW Sir,

Sure, Taken your words. I will avoid these mistakes.

Regards, Sai Krishna.