on 03-07-2013 7:07 AM
Hi Experts,
i have two cases regarding source inspection
1].We are using source inspection process to iniate inspection lot against purchase order line item, but when we reject particular lot; I am unable to create new insp lot.
2]. In Q- info record we source insp.- no GR, but it create inspection lot at the time of GR.
Your both the statements are contradicting ....
In nutshell when you define the "Source Inspection : No GR" it means if Source IL is rejected ,GR can not happen for this PO line item.
If this is not happening then there is issue with QI record or PO or QM view Maintained.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
My 1st statement is that i want create new inspection lot aganist Purchase Order LI, when i reject my first lot which is created by Source inspection porcess.(Overall meaning of my statement is that i want take multiple inspection call against Purchase order Line Item).
2nd case is different which states that when i tick in Q-info record for indicator source insp.- no GR it can not create the lot when i actually do GR of Purchase order LI.
Check the customization of control key in QCC0>>QM in logistic>>QM in procurement>>define control key>>GR/Source Insp Control >>GR for rejection >> here you will get answer of your first & second query.
Remember that for the same quality info record you can not achive your both the requirements simulteniously with same control key.
My 1st case i use xxx control key with above condition but it can not create new inspection lot after my first lot is rejected >>Here I hope 'first IL' means sorce Inspection lot ,that you are saying.
If you have done said customization then ,additionally you must have selected "Source Inspection : No GR" in Qinfo record.
Dear Sujit,
I explain our process & requirement again:
We have two inspection process in procurement
Our 1st process is regularised in well manner, but we are implemented 2nd process. we face following problem in the implementation.
Already i have done all customization as earlier mentioned in my previous post.
As per my my understanding tick in QI Record of "Source Inspection : No GR" is for Lot genration process at the time of GR.
Dear Sujit,
I explain our process & requirement again:
We have two inspection process in procurement
Our 1st process is regularised in well manner, but we are implemented 2nd process. we face following problem in the implementation.
Already i have done all customization as earlier mentioned in my previous post.
As per my my understanding tick in QI Record of "Source Inspection : No GR" is for Lot genration process at the time of GR.
Dear Sujit,
I explain our process & requirement again:
We have two inspection process in procurement
Our 1st process is regularised in well manner, but we are implemented 2nd process. we face following problem in the implementation.
Already i have done all customization as earlier mentioned in my previous post.
As per my my understanding tick in QI Record of "Source Inspection : No GR" is for Lot genration process at the time of GR.
Dear Sujit,
I explain our process & requirement again:
We have two inspection process in procurement
Our 1st process is regularised in well manner, but we are implemented 2nd process. we face following problem in the implementation.
Already i have done all customization as earlier mentioned in my previous post.
As per my my understanding tick in QI Record of "Source Inspection : No GR" is for Lot genration process at the time of GR.
Hi,
I think a lot then found two ways regarding this problem, Please tell me this are
Thanks for Reply.
This process is integration of QM with MM.
Issue here is how will you manage to create again manual lot in QA07 for same PO with same line item ,as that entry is already deleted or same PO number exists in source inspection lot already.
Its expected logically that you should not create new source IL ,if source lot created is rejected.
Instead of making it so complex create a new Inspection lot with 89 type.that's what I would suggest.
User | Count |
---|---|
92 | |
9 | |
9 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.