difference between accepted and party accepted

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus ,

could some explain what is the difference between accepted and party accepted with respect of AS2 seeburger adapter

when we can use accept and party accepted

Thanks in Advance

Regards,

Sreeni.

[MichalKrawczyk · Accepted solution]

Hi,

I believe accepted is for messages where all messages inside are correct

and partly accepted where some are not correct but the process keeps going (with correct ones) 

and partner will get informed (via 997) which were not correct in partly accepted

is that the same case in your scenario ?

Regards,

Michal Krawczyk

[S0003485845 · Accepted solution]

That is absolutely correct.

When you specify "Accepted" ...it means that all messages in an interchange need to be correct (syntax ok) to be forwarded to the selected SenderAgreement for further processing.

When you setup a Splitter-Entry that uses "Partly Accepted" it means, even if there are some messages with syntax error, the remaining correct messages will be forwarded to the specified "Sender Agreement"

These settings are referring to the "BIC-Module" in the module chain and are independent from the AS2-protocol , as you can use this also together with any other communication adapter (AS2, FTP, X400...)...

Kind Regards

Stefan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Michal /Stefan ,

many thanks for your quick response 

if we have accepted and partly accepted entry in Splitter entry .

which splitter entry takes that message

i am very new to EDI and AS2 if you have any document related to SEEBURGER

coulld you please provide me that would be very great help to us

Regards,

Sreeni.

.

[nabendu_sen · Accepted solution]

Hi Sreeni,

You can go through the 6-Series blog of Prateek about Basics of Seeburger which is a nice one.

http://scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2009/08/01/seeburger--part-1--the-basics

Couple of other:

http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70808338-c4ea-2b10-dcb4-c628756da...

http://scn.sap.com/blogs/srikanthforsap/2010/09/20/key-based-authentication--sap-pi--seeburger-sftp-...

http://scn.sap.com/blogs/srikanthforsap/2010/09/20/key-based-authentication--sap-pi--seeburger-sftp-...

[S0003485845 · Accepted solution]

Hi Sreeni,

If you receive an Interchange with multiple messages which are all with a correct syntax, then all of them will get the status "accepted".

=> so in this case, the SplitterEntry with the setting "Accepted" will pick them up and assign them to the desired Sender Agreement for further processing.

If you receive an Interchange with multiple messages (e.g. 10 messages where 8 of them are correct while 2 have a syntax error") , then the messages which are correct will get the status "partly accepted"

=> so in this case, the SplitterEntry with the setting "Partly Accepted" will pick them up and assign them to the desired Sender Agreement for further processing

In many cases, the Seeburger-Adapter-Customers only setup the "Accepted"- settings... as the data quality in the EDI-area is in the meantime very good and it only occurs very seldom that messages do not follow the syntax...

In addition, a Splitter entry is then  created with the parameters DEFAULT | DEFAULT | PartlyAccepted , so that all interchanges (for all partners/messagetypes) which have any error inside get routed to the same SenderAgreement for further processing (error handling)

To get some first understanding of the Inbound scenario, you can also take a look at this blog:

http://scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2013/01/13/quick-setup

Kind Regards

Stefan

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Stefan thanks for your clear explanation..

Regards,

Sreeni