on 01-16-2013 5:20 AM
Hi Experts,
I have a planning book which is assigned to a number of users. Each user has a specific selection profile assigned to him/her. They are responsible to update a specific keyfigure in the planning book after the forecast run, taking the forecast as reference, within the next 2 days. We want to know which all users have updated the Planning book as per their assigned profiles. Since the number of users are more, Is there any standard process to track User updates? If not, what should be the basis for a custom development to generate a report kind of thing, if possible.
Regards,
Avinas.
Hi Avinas,
SAP CS can deploy the required tracking add-on on top of standard SCM application. Please check the following SAP note for details.
Note 1308968 - Change log for APO DP and APO SNP
Thanks,
Rajesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Awesome..
Is this charged additionally by SAP ?.
Wonder why wouldnt SAP provide the such a basic thing in standard menu. I have always lied to the client when asked about this.. May be they were just fussy because I know its of no use to them.. so I was ingenious when desining this
Big price to pay for ignorance of things that are out there. done, tested and dusted.
If you like to free and better option try this. some serious consultant posted this ages ago
see 1. a , page2
http://www.infosys.com/manufacturing/resource-center/Documents/APO-DP-Design.pdf
The consultant talks about using PLANNER ID as a characteristic in selection. This is probably do-able quickly and makes sense but this will not work if user ID's are being shared (also a license violation.)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Good luck auditing this.. As far as I know SAP does not have a program for audit trail of changes to data in live cache.. May be some application table has latest changes.
Morever user security in planning books is at best a compromise. Clean distinctions if needed for security reasons can come only from having separate planning areas but too many planning area are also a pain to manage
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.