cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Lock Table Overflow Owner

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,  in my ECC6 system, i got the following in my system log:

GE Lock Table overflow

GE Internal lock administration error

GZ >EqSetCluster(); rtc=16 enxxmenq1905

The size of the lock is 4MB.

In ENQ file and SM12:

EnqStoreTopHist: Lock Table Overflow at 2013/01/14  caused by

Cnt=     964 Cli=800 Uname=U1   Tcode=KEU5               

   Owner1=20130114203527058000000502SAP.......................

   Owner2=20130114203527058000000502SAP.......................

Cnt=     956 Cli=800 Uname=U1   Tcode=KEU5               

   Owner1=20130114203530477000000502SAP........................

   Owner2=20130114203530477000000502SAP.......................

Cnt=     946 Cli=800 Uname=U1   Tcode=KEU5               

   Owner1=20130114203523889000000502SAP.......................

   Owner2=20130114203523889000000502SAP.......................

From the log above, it shows the user U1 running the transaction code KEU5 is causing the lock overflow.

My question:

-Why there are 3 entries? Does it mean user U1 run the transasction code KEU5 3 times? 

Thank you.

regards,

zl

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI

please check the enque /table_size parameter in RZ11  and read the documentation for that parameter

find effected parameter by changing it and dependent things for changing the parameter.Change accordingly.

Thanks

ashish_vikas
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

please go through this.. it should clear your doubt.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/d3/43d2416d9c1c7be10000000a1550b0/content.htm

Best Regards

ashish

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

I have gone through the link, but it didn't answered my question.

Why there are 3 entries? Does it mean user U1 run the transasction code KEU5 3 times? 

Or user U1 run the transaction code KEU5 once but it log 3 entries?

regards,

zl

former_member188883
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi ZL,

Above 3 entries implies 3 data row lock exists in the database. To avoid lock overflow issues you may need to increase the size of lock table to 8192.

Regards,

Deepak Kori