XI vs Soap( over XI )

[former_member474221]

Hi,

I have many file to Proxy interfaces . Which of the following design is better  performance wise-

1. File to proxy ( using XI adapter ) ....here this is better because no adapter required on the receiver...

2. File to proxy ( Using SOAP adapter and XI protocol  using ICO) .....here this is better because it uses AAE

[Former Member]

Dear Hema,

Generally we go for File to proxy ( Using SOAP adapter and XI protocol using ICO) when we have to deal with huge volume of data .

And if data volume is normal then we use XI adapter because we can monitor pipe line steps thoroughly in this configuration .

you will not see much difference between both configuration if data is in normal volume.

thanks and regards,

Anup Banerjee

[Former Member]

Hi Hema,

We do require XI adapter if it is at receiver side.

SOAP adapter is better when compared to proxy in case if we have a heavy load synchronous scenario say for example  jdbc to SOAP having sla ;then we will prefer SOAP instead of XI there.

[Former Member]

that is depend on version and volume of data.

1. File to proxy ( using XI adapter ) ....here this is better because no adapter required on the receiver...

if PI is dual stack then you go for  Xi Adapter and one more thing is Receiver adapter is need to create  for Proxy as receiver.this is generally follow the way.

if Proxy is sender(SAP Syatem) then no need create Sender Adapter

2. File to proxy ( Using SOAP adapter and XI protocol  using ICO) .....here this is better because it uses AAE.

if you are proceesing huge volume of data(Message) then you go for AAE .