With respect to the whole internal processing in FI-TV dependant on the trip status directory, I would suggest "abusing" the ANTRG-status 5 (request on hold missing documents) and ANTRG-status 6 (trip on hold missing documents). In our business processes, we don't have a need for these statuses, but we do have two-level approvals.
There was at first the tought of using a workflow and just "reset" the statuses from 2-1 and 4-1 back to 1-1 and 3-1 and pass the workitems to the next approver. Workflow-wise this worked out but functionally and considering the behaviour of other components of the FI-TV it was a catastrophe.
So what we did, was abusing ANTRG-status 5 and 6 for "approved first level waiting for second", so our status process for second level approvals are:
1-1 -> 5-1 -> 2-1
3-1 -> 6-1 -> 4-2
This is working in a clean way (as far as we observed up until now). I can't promise you this is the best approach and of course you strip yourself of statuses 5-1 and 6-1 because you shouldn't/can't use it for anything else anymore then.
Hope this helps as an idea.
Cheers, Lukas
EDIT: P.S. To answer your actual question, multi level approval isn't provided by SAP standard in FI-TV
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.