on 12-09-2012 7:52 PM
Dear Gurus,
At present we are using QE51N for Result Recording for physical samples and we now want to shift to QE23
can anybody suggest what are the adavantages or disadvantages with this and which one is more usefull for result recording of Physical samples
Thanks in advance
Regards
Mahesh
HI
QE51N shows all the samples and result recording can be done for all the samples staying in the same screen.
FOR QE23 you need to navigate to and fro ( in and out ) for every sample to do the recording .
Regards
Sunil Ayakar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI
QE51N - Show the inspection lots which are for results recording REL status no UD has been made.
It will show list of inspection lot in one flow & will able to do the result recording accordingly
QE23 is basically for Physical sample inpsection only, will do the result recording for inspection lot.
Regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
When you record result in QE51n for physical sample ,its call in QE23 in background.
Both are same transaction ,only QE51n is an overview.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.