Idoc - Jdbc : Acknowledgement/Response issue

[Former Member]

Hi All,

I have designed an idoc to jdbc scenario (asynchronous).  Sender is idoc (without adapter).

It’s working fine when I test from an ECC first client, whereas when I test from second client, I am getting an acknowledgment/response back to PI. 

In PI server, the table IDXNOALE  has the required port/client/message type details to stop the acknowledgement for both the clients.  But still I am getting the acknowledgement/response back when I test from the second client.

The acknowledgment is coming via Adapter Engine, then it’s getting failed in Integration engine saying ‘No Receiver agreement found’.

If I look into in IE, It’s showing as below

Sender component/Sender interface/Receiver component/Receiver interface      Err/schedule/success/Terminated with err.

• <ECCclient>/<idoc>/<Business component>/<SI_XXX_IB>                                               0/0/1/0                                                                              à Valid entry
• <Business component>/< SI_XXX_IB>/ < ECCclient>/<SI_XXX_IB>                                1/0/0/0                                                                              à Invalid entry, not required

Below are some of the details of that response/acknowledgement found in IE

Pipeline	CENTRAL_BACK
Acknowledgment Status	088
Error Category	OUTBINDING
Error Code	CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND
Message Type	A

The response message id holds an reference id which is the actual message id for triggering an idoc.

Note : - I have designed the Service Interface SI_XXX_IB asynchronously.                                      

Please guide/suggest me in solving the above issue.

Thanks & Regards,

Senthil J   

[rajasekhar_reddy14 · Accepted solution]

Hi Senthil,

execute report IDX_NOALE and disable ack for all message types,  Make sure that you have entered correct sender port details.

You need execute this report in PI system and request Do Not Request Acknowledgment for both Ports(ECC two clients).

This  solution definetly works.

Regards,

Raj

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Senthil,

Follow the below link to suppress the acknowledgments.

http://scn.sap.com/thread/1648640

Thanks,

Satish.