Search Connectors not available in PLM WebUI

[Mattias]

Hello,

We're trying to configure the PLM WebUI, and are having some trouble with the search connectors in the quick search. We'ev creted the required indexes in esh_cockpit and the data objects in spro, however the web ui still says:

 Enterprise Search Connector for object type PLM_ACC is not available 
 Enterprise Search Connector for object type PLM_BOMMAT is not available 
 Enterprise Search Connector for object type PLM_DIR is not available 
 Enterprise Search Connector for object type PLM_ECN is not available 
 Enterprise Search Connector for object type PLM_MAT is not available 

Regards

Mattias

[Mattias · Accepted solution]

There was an error in the PLM WebUI configuration, it was configured to use SES while our TRex is setup for Enterprise Search

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hello Mattials,

We are facing a similar error , could you kindly elobarate on what PLM Web UI confguration have you changed in detail.

Where do you change from SES to TREX ?

Best regards,

Shashikumar BS

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Shashi!

You need to ensure the RFC destination to TREX is working properly and then run the report

ESH_ADM_SET_TREX_DESTINATION by specifying that RFC destination.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Rajeev

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

HI Rajeev,

Thanks for earlier input, i did check and we had some glitches related to size and the same is sorted out now.

But still we find the same error while searching from Web UI !!

Thanks for your help..!

Regards,

Shashikumar BS

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Shashi,

Please check the entries for the field Request (type) in the IMG activity Define Settings for PLM Search. For ACC, it should be blank. For material, BOM, DIR and ECM, it should be PLM, whereas for other objects it should be Default.

Actually, there are several activities you need to do to set up PLM Search correctly, and these can be found in the RDS documentation for PLM Foundation. Have you followed them properly?

Regards,

Rajeev