on 10-24-2012 4:11 PM
Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement JDBC to RFC Synchronous communication.
CC1--> JDBC Sender Adapter with Qos-->Best Effort
CC2--> RFC Receiver Adapter
CC3--> JDBC Receiver Adapter
I am using this sceanrio bsed on the link:
MMRequest:
MMResponse:
MMRequest--> RequestID back to MMResponse -->RequestID, how?
Now I have to update the record based on the value in RequestID in database.
How to get this value from MMRequest to MMResponse?
Any ASMA configuration? Please explain clearly.
I am new to java coding. Even any method to solve this issue using java or any method?
Regards,
Sreeni.
Hi Kancham,
Please go through the link:
http://scn.sap.com/message/3291945#3291945
This talks about a SAP note 1039779 which resolves the bug with JDBC adapters.
Hope it resolves your issue.
Ambrish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I assume you have done ESR developments and you require help on how to do configuration using RequstResponseBean and ResponseOnewayBean to make Async-Sync bridge in communication channel.
Please have a look in to this blog for settings to be done in ID part. This is a File SOAP Sync Mail scenario. You can have a look and complete your configuration in ID.
Regards
Aashish Sinha
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Very simple solution for this requirement is
When you send a request id to data base insert same request ID in data base,as part of response ask your DB team to send request ID also.
You need to change JDBC response structure to hold request ID.
Regards,
Raj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You need to modify the response of the request of the RFC module to send the value from the DB request. when the RFC is executed return that value in the RETURN structure.
If that is not possible you can use a dummy field in the RFC that you are not currently ussing in your interface, and return the value in a dummy field in the RETURn Structure or just modify it.
also there is another possiblity but take much work to do - passing values between mappings using functions Library but for your case is not the best option.
Regards
Rodrigo
User | Count |
---|---|
95 | |
11 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.