Adjustment runs for security deposit contract in RE-FX

[Former Member]

Hi Gurus,

In our process, we are creating contract and security deposit contract separately. (Example-If contract no is 1000 and security deposit contract no. will be 1001.)

We are trying to achieve the adjustment run functionality for Security deposit contract using T-Code: REAJPR. 

Ex: If condition amount is 3000 initially when contract is created. When posting done, 3000 should get post. After Rent adjustment to 10%, condition amount become 3300. Then it should post 300 INR only (difference amount = adjusted rent – basic rent).

To achieve the above scenario, we have created a statistical condition with calculation formula as “Fixed Amount” with amount 1 INR and One-time posting condition with calculation formula as ‘Condition Group Factor” to the security deposit contract.

When we run periodic posting it is throwing an error message as “No cash flow planned records found for given period”.

We have found,  From Object is displayed as “Contract” and Corresponding contract number is displayed in Conditions Tab ->  Calculation Tab -> From Object (=4^th parameter in the screen ). If we remove this contract number in From object we are able to achieve the expected.

Kindly help how to avoid displaying From Object as contract number in Security deposit contract screen.

Regds,

[Former Member]

Hi Shankar,

well, this should of course work but you are right with the fact regarding the adjustment of one-time conditions. This only works as of EhP2 (see also note 1244244). However, it is the statistical index-based condition that will be adjusted and this is not a one-time condition.

Basically, all you have to do is the following:

      1. Define a statistical index-based condition and adjust it accordingly
      2. Create a one-time condition with internal calculation formula
      'Condition Group Factor' and active flag 'difference'
      (GF_UNIQUECONDDIFF) that refers to the index.based condition with a
     factor = 1.

That's it and you should easily get the desired result.

BR,

Fernando

[Former Member]

Hi,

Kindly advise anything in this regard.

Thanks

Shankar

[Former Member]

Hi Shankar,

My understanding of your scenario is as under ...

Main contract 1000 is having the rent of 3000 (01.04.12 to 31.03.13)

And security deposit contract no.1001 is having one-time statistical conditon type with calculation formula - condition group factor

Initially you have posted 3000 as security depost from security deposit contracts, now let us assume the rent is increased from 3000 to 3300 from 01.11.12 and you want to post the differential amount 300 against security deposit contract number 1001.

If my understanding is correct, it should work.

Create one-time actual rent condition type instead of statistical in security deposit contact and select condition purpose as ‘Actual rent’ and calculation formula as ‘condition group factor’.

When you are doing adjustments through REAJPR,  select  ‘Follow-on contracts’ check box in Activity Parameters tab. If you select this check box, contract 1001 also will get update along with main contract 1000. Then go to Work lists RECARG and update pending activities, now  you will find debit follow-up posting of 300 in your security deposit contract. You can post this amount (300) through RERAPP.

Pl let me know if my understanding of scenario is wrong, will try to resolve.

Rgds,

Srini

[Former Member]

Hi Srini,

Thank you for answering.

Your understanding is correct. But in our process, adjustment run for contract & adjustment run for security deposit contract both have been executed separately through T-Code-REAJPR. Because adjustment rule could be different for contract and security deposit contract.

We have followed your steps but it is not reached as required. Also, I do not see updated object list (Ex. Contract number) in T-code-RECARG after adjustment done for contract.

In OSS message, SAP has suggested

“to create a statistical condition with the condition amount of 3000 and
a one-time condition with formula 'condition group factor' and an unit-
price of 1. For the one-time condition you do an connection to the
statistical condition on tab 'calculation' and set the flag 'Differ.'
(see screenshots in attachment). You assign the statistical condition
to the adjustment rule and adjust it. The statistical condition amount
becomes 3300 after an adjustment to 10%. The one-time condition should
be posted with 300.”

By following above steps we have reached the expected behavior but we have found that “From Object is displayed as “Contract” and Corresponding contract number is displayed in Conditions Tab ->  Calculation Tab -> From Object (=4th parameter in the screen ). If we remove this contract number in From object we are able to achieve the expected.”

Kindly please help what to do to avoid contract being defaulted.

Regds,

Shankar