on 10-16-2012 9:09 AM
Good Afternoon Gurus,
Network activity 111111-A is worngly assigned to network 111111, actuclly activity should belong to network 222222.
Network activity 111111-A has actucal cost.
Will the wrong assignment of a NWA to NW Header affect anything in the project
Is there any functionality difference when an NWA is assigned to a particular NW Header or is the purpose of the header purely related to how NWAs are grouped?
Please throw light on this issue
I hope only data in reporting will vary
Thanks
MM
Dear Menaka,
as Gokul said, if you can live with the incorrect assignment, and let it be. After the actual costs were posted, it is not possible to move it or delete it. You can do a settlement of the costs of this activity to a new activity, but the settled costs may have different meaning of the direct posted costs.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Menaka,
I have checked on my system but this is not allowing any drag and drop to different network but can allow within same network.
When you have actual cost occurred via any means this will not allow according to me and follow the same as suggested by Gokul (reverse the actual postings and create the activity under the correct network header.).
thanks
Sunil
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Not sure but logically you can move via drag and drop method NWA to where you want to assign under any WBS if you are using multiple NW header then no.
because commitment with activity it be.
Regards,
Sanjeev
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
I also tried to darg and drop actvity from Network A to Network B and I do got same mesage as below
Message no. CNPB015
Later I tried to drop the activity to the WBS (say WBS B) of the Network B and it got assigned to WBS B but Network Assignment still remains to Network A only..so I guess as suggested by Gokul, rework seems the only option.
Hi Menaka,
Yes, you are correct. I don't see any adverse impact. Only the data in reporting will vary. If you are ok with that let it be as it is. Else, reverse the actual postings and create the activity under the correct network header.
Regards,
Gokul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
103 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.