on 10-12-2012 1:27 PM
Hello Experts ,
In our sytem RESB table holding very huge data, planning to delete data from RESB
Tried using MBVR tcode and runnning archiving objects PP_ORDER ..etc,but still it is unable to delete the data from RESB table
Please let us know any other approach to delete data from table RESB
Much appreaciated for your help
Thanks
Krishna
unable to delete the data from RESB table
You need to be more specific!... What do you mean by that?... As far as I know theres multiple Archiving objects related to the contents of that table.
Regards, Juan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Tried with all archiving objects for RESB table with differnt selection criteria in screens like giving material number and plant . but still no luck
and using tcode MBVR provided reservation number and Base date getting message " No document exists for Specified data "
Please guide in solving the issue
Regards
vamsi
Tried with all archiving objects for RESB table with differnt selection criteria in screens like giving material number and plant . but still no luck
Ok, I hope you are not doing that on your production system.
Not sure what sort of analisys you have done to declare the size of RESB table a problem, I would be more concerned about its performance than its size.
In anycase, Archiving is more complicated than just throwing old data into a repository. Archiving is a project on its own where your SAP team and the different LOB's select the archiving objects based the customer needs, performance gains, system growth projection, etc...
I think you need to give this a bit more thought.
Regards, Juan
Direct deleting data from this table is recomended ?
Certainly not, You should never delete data directly from the tables.
or any other approach
Sure, You do need to analize in detail why is taking so long, but an educated guess will be to asume that a lot of sequencial reading is happening due to not very well tuned indexes...
But in anycase, you need to find the bottleneck... You might be able to build a good case for archiving and reduce the number of records in the table but again I think you do your research.
Regards, Juan
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.