on 10-12-2012 8:36 AM
Hi All ,
We have done Service Tax utilisation recently with all correct accouting entries.
User have selected the correct period & posted the document accordingly. But by mistake user has posted the document in current data instead of previous date (31mar2012).
Due to this Service tax ledger is still showing open item in the month of March.
Pls suggest if there is any provision in SAP to reverse J2IUN service tax utlisation entry or any other adjustments .
Thanks in advance
Sachin
No man. You are taking this in wrong way. I mean to say that you just flagged like rather it could have been helpful ans. Here no one is point hungry. We wont get any medal for high points. We are just helping each other by sharing knowledge.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
K. Well nilesh , i have not marked it as helpful becos i personally feel that any Excise or CIN related entry should not be passed via FI directly. I have discussed same issue with my other mates also and they have also suggested me to avoid FI JV. Instead they have told me to explore that Excise JV (J1IH). If i post it through FI JV then respective Entry will not get updated in J_1IPART2 Table.If i post it through J1IH adjustment entry then it will get reflect in table which helps me to avoid separate records.
Currently i am studying the same topic and will share if i find something useful .
Hope you understand & appreciate.
Cheers !!
Sachin
Hi,
Find answers inline:
a) Is there any negative impact on system if we post a JV directly.
Definitely there is impact. Amount will be adjusted in GLs and in excise .
b) If no , then why do we prefer J2IUN over JV Entry for utilization entry.
J2IUN is a SAP provided process for full flange utilization. You no when we use a standard process transaction, it updates many tables and creates further followon documents. Hence better to use J2IUN.
c) Is there any other thing which we need to take care while posting this JV Entry.
J2IUN entry will be there in registers for utilization.manually with the help of annexure, excise user need to keep records so that if any cross questioning is there from excise authorities, he need to produce the proofs.
If you dont have further queries, mark this as answered, otherwise we will end up with email notifications in our inbox.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You need to post JV via FI, but in registers there will always be entry for utilisation. There is no way of taking this revert back untill you do table entries. I am not in favour of table entries. Try convencing user abut the consequences. dont try to revert j2iun, its not possible.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.