on 09-25-2012 3:33 PM
Hello All,
I have been trying to set-up the following scenario:
NFS to RFC with request-response module added to NFS channel.
When I supply a Mail adapter channel as value for parameter receiverChannel in module, the RFC response hits my inbox as expected. However, XI/SOAP/HTTP in place of Mail adapter produces a standard error '...CPAObjectException null value...'.
Has anybody managed to address this problem before?
Any inputs are appreciated.
Thank you.
PS: BPM is not prefered here.
--
Srii
Hi All
I am having the same problem when using XI adapter in ResponseonewayBean . It works when i replace the XI adapter with file adapter but errors with CPAObjectKeyException: Value of key must not be null error.
Did anybody manage to find the root cause of this problem? .
Thank you
Venkat
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Problem resolved. The cause of failure earlier is unknown. I am mystified!
Thanks for your efforts, Guys.
-
Srii
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Are you using Mail adapter as receiver? If responseonewaybean does not work for mail adapter then other approach is replace receiver mail with file adapter. Create another scenario file to mail for that purpose if you dont want to implement bpm.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I'm seeing this thread setting the parameter receiverON = MailReceiver. This seems setting in case of RFC error to mail the message. You might want to try this. But I haven't tried this solution.
Appreciate your efforts to dig deeper, Baskar.
I am under the impression that receiverOnFault parameter could potentially detect errors only from a technical transmission view-point [such as BAPI not available, R3 not reachable, etc]. However, that is certainly a factor to be tested. I'll update the thread after a try. Thank you.
-
Srii
SOAP/HTTP support sync communicaton , why you need a module?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hmm, not sure If I understood that totally.
But this is the flow description in my words:
Current implementation:
NFS -> PI -> RFC -> [using module] Mail Adapter
The new need is:
NFS -> PI -> RFC -> [using module] SOAP/HTTP/XI -> PI [pass only if response contains an error] -> Mail Adapter
Does this give more clarity?
-
Sriii
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.