on 09-14-2012 8:23 AM
Hello Experts,
I have a scenario where rfcLookup is used in message mapping. Now the problem is, once I transport only the message mapping to QA the rfc parameters in Signature tab, is not getting transported and it is showing error while opening message mapping.
Below is the screenshot of the of the rfc parameter in signature tab what we need in QA as well.
Though I am not changing any FuncLib still I am getting the below Processing log while opening it in QA :
The source structure, target structure, or a function library has been changed or could not be found in the Enterprise Services Repository. The mapping definition contains elements or attributes that do not exist in the changed structure, or functions that were changed in a function library. The relevant entries will be deleted. Java type of a parameter in function 'rfclookup' has changed. Parameter binding will be ignored
Please suggest the necessary steps.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks experts for all your timely help.
This problem is resolved now. As I was transporting the Changelist, the Parameters were not coming in Signature tab of message mapping. Now once I have transported the Message Mapping as an individual object it is reflecting in Signature tab properly...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
try refreshing caches
regards,
Edu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
Check if there are any version conflicts in your mapping . if there is a version conflict activate your current/latest version.
this normally occurs if you change any design objects directly in QA and again try to transport from DEV environment.
This should resolve your issue.
Regards,
Naveen.
Hi,
Did you transported the communication channel used by RFC lookup also?
Regards
Hari.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.