on 08-30-2012 3:07 PM
Well I have discovered the mystery!
In my mapping, and maybe only in my PI 7.3 SP 5 , if I test the RFC Lookup with 'display queue' the RFC is called two times, otherwise, if I test the mapping in the TAB test the RFC is called one time!!!
Very strange, don't you think? ;D
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, I confirm that the BAPI it's called two times, I used an external break point into the bapi and PI, I don't know in why, calls the BAPI two times. !!! :-S
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Ok,
I tried to call the RFC from SE37, BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE is a standard bapi to create a production order in SAP. With the same values of the rfc test from message mapping test in PI this is the result:
Only one record, not two!
Aron in the RWB the receiver RFC channel has two calls for one test from message mapping test !!! You can see two messages id at the same time:
So the RFC, maybe, it's called twice .. but why? O_o
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
first time this issue happend or tested RFC lookup first time?If this interface is old and woked as expected then you need to do more analysys .
like test Function module in ECC and check results.
if it is new interface then try Aaron reply.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Antonello, have you tried collapsing context on all the inputs?
It looks like the constants are coming in at a different level, maybe this could cause it.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.