on 08-04-2012 11:40 AM
Dear All,
Thanks for the extensive support.
We have got a typical scenario over here.
We get a 70% abetment on MRP on the good sold.
In such scenario we need to attach one more MRP condition type in our standard pricing procedure.
The pricing which is required is :
100 | 0 | PR00 | Price | ERL |
350 | 0 | ZMRP | MRP Price | ERL |
400 | 0 | ZMRD | Discount % from MRP | 350 | MWS |
450 | 0 | ZBED | Basic Excise Duty | 400 | EXD |
500 | 0 | ZECE | Education Cess | 450 | EXD |
550 | 0 | ZSHE | Sec.Higher Edu.Cess | 450 | EXD |
555 | 0 | CR Price | 100 |
650 | 0 | Sub total | 450 | 550 |
700 | 0 | ZCST | IN A/R CST | 555 | 650 | MWS |
725 | 0 | ZVAT | IN A/R VAT | 555 | 650 | MWS |
750 | 0 | Total | 555 | 725 |
800 | 0 | Sales Revenue | 750 |
The problem over here is that we are not able to attach two price type condition in one pricing. Secondly the Net price which is getting calculated also includes the MRP price.
Actual Scenario should be:
Standard Price
MRP PRICE
70% abetment on MRP Price.
Excise duty on Abetment value.
Vat/ CST on Standard Price
Net value ( Standard Price + Duty Value + Tax + Freight )
Kindly suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Om Prakash Gupta
Hi om,
Instead you can maintain MRP as main and the Price will be Arrived after Abetment Discount on MRP.
Thanks
Prasad
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear All,
I have the resolved the issue by my self.
I have created and a new condition type for MRP and a abetment condition type for abetment and had made the calculation procedure accordingly.
Its working fine.
The only issue which is coming is that I am not able to print the billing doccument ( Invoice).
It gives me an error to create Excise Invoice first, which I have already done.
The line nos. of the Item is getting changed in ascending order while doing VF01, so zero qty ( In Case Batch Split ) is coming on the top. and so the error.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks / OP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Om,
Your requirement looks pretty straight forward requirement to me.
The MRP price is only to calculate the Excise duty and all the other calculation will be done on the standard price.
In your pricing procedure for the MRP condition type (ZMRP) activate "Statistical" field.
Thus system shall ONLY consider PR00 as price.
For excise, keep the Calculation type = A (percentage) for that condition type.
For excise condition type, in your pricing procedure give reference "From" the step number of ZMRP
In VK11, for excise condition type give 70%
Then test.
Added by TW: I have tested this (statistical for PR02; thus PR00 is the price) in IDES and it works!
Message was edited by: T W
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Shetty,
The challenge is that when we are including both the price type i.e pr00 and ZMRP.
The Total or the net price which is getting calculated is taking values of both the condition i.e. PR00 and zmrp. which should not be the case.
The Ideal Scenario would be.
Base price.
- Discount
Mrp
30 % MRP
Excise duty on 30% MRP.
VAT on ( Base price + excise duty )
Total / Net Price ( base price + excise duty + vat ).
Kindly suggest.
Regards
OP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear OP,
Please Clarify my doubt, are you creating a condition record for both PR00 and ZMRP for a Single Material ( I mean Line Item) and Trying to Test it?. If so "DO NOT" test by creating single condition record for A MATERIAL instead. Have two material and create condition record one for ZMRP and other for PR00. This should work.
More Over the Scenario which you are trying to explain me does not seems to be business there in Business Scenario
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong :
Regards
MShetty
Have two material and create condition record one for ZMRP and other for PR00.
First, from my understanding, in the system user can not created ONE condition record for two condition types.
Second, why "two materials", it is one line item in a sales order which represents ONE MMR and the pricing (i.e. both condition types PR00 and ZMRP) are for the same MMR.
Dear All,
I am not charging twice..
The MRP price is only to calculate the Excise duty and all the other calculation will be done on the standard price.
We get 70% abetment of excise duty on MRP price on few of our products.
So we need to trace the MRP in order to calculate the Excise duty.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
OP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear OP,
I do not see any difficulty in mapping this, please note that for a given line item in your SO, You will have either PR00 OR ZMRP as active. At a given moment both condition type cannot be active at the same time.
Please keep the same attribute to ZMRP and proceed further, i do not see any challenge here..
Regards
Mshetty
Dear Om Prakash,
I am wondering, why are you charging "PRICE" twice to Customer, By this I mean, You have assigned "ACCOUNT KEY" to both Price (PR00) and MRP (ZMRP) Condition Types?
If I am not wrong, You are supposed keep one condition type Statistical and other one Active and Hence there will be one posting of price elements in accounting document.
Regards
Muralidhar Shetty
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Please give an example
(e.g. value of PR00 = Standard price = 100USD,
value of ZMRP = MRP price = ......etc.)
What you want to populate in the sales order
- in Tab Condition
- as price?
For condition types with condition class = B price, only one (the one with the highest step # in the pricing procedure) is considered in the sales order.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
98 | |
11 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.