on 07-29-2012 10:14 PM
Dear experts,
we are currently preparing for an internal project to implement SCM-EWM with EWM-MFS. We need to interface conveyor as well as high-rack shelf systems. I've already analyzed the current TCP/IP (socket-based) traffic between the control systems and the legacy system. Once again I'm afraid SAP will be too slow.
I've searched many pages but haven't found any indication yet what the standard response time of the material flow control component in combination with PCo is. Scenario: SAP SCM-EWM Server 10 meters away from the conveyor (meaning "no" network delay), Release 7.02, PCo 2.2 connecting to one conveyor controller. No other system load. Telegram of controller saying "I've read SSCC barcode <xyz>". SAP responding: "Send SSCC <xyz> to conveyor area <ABC>". I'm interested in the typical time in ms between these two telegrams.
Any practical experience in that area?
Franz
Performence is satisfactory if you use conveyour for pallets. Whole proces described by you takes 0,2-0,5 sec (including logical check of HU in EWM)
Below some real data from live system;
PLC | Comm.chan. | Time | MS | Sender | Recip. | CP | Handshake | SeqN | TeleTyp | Handling Unit | Source | Dest. |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:05:57 | 265 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000001988 | SCAN | 140973609154583382 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:05:57 | 270 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000001988 | SCAN | 140973609154583382 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:05:57 | 553 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000005817 | LCCO | 140973609154583382 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:05:57 | 785 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000005817 | LCCO | 140973609154583382 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:06:24 | 855 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000001990 | SCAN | 140973609154584655 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:06:24 | 860 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000001990 | SCAN | 140973609154584655 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:06:25 | 144 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000005818 | LCCO | 140973609154584655 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:06:25 | 381 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000005818 | LCCO | 140973609154584655 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:10:49 | 312 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000001992 | SCAN | 140973609154584686 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:10:49 | 318 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000001992 | SCAN | 140973609154584686 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:10:49 | 593 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000005821 | LCCO | 140973609154584686 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:10:49 | 838 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000005821 | LCCO | 140973609154584686 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:17 | 122 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000001994 | SCAN | 140973609154581029 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:17 | 128 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000001994 | SCAN | 140973609154581029 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:17 | 412 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000005822 | LCCO | 140973609154581029 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:17 | 574 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000005822 | LCCO | 140973609154581029 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:44 | 424 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000001996 | SCAN | 140973609154584648 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:44 | 437 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000001996 | SCAN | 140973609154584648 | ||
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:44 | 797 | EWM_AAA | AAA_PLC1 | 1_19 | R | 00000000000000005823 | LCCO | 140973609154584648 | 12_23 | |
AAA_PLC1 | 2 | 11:11:45 | 111 | AAA_PLC1 | EWM_AAA | 1_19 | C | 00000000000000005823 | LCCO | 140973609154584648 | 12_23 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Ashu,
I cannot comment on the project progress of Franz or Leszek.
Nevertheless, I would like to point to the following information, which might be helpful:
Unfortunately, I did not understand your questions regarding multiple resources and MFS. Could you please explain a bit more in detail?
Best regards,
Tobias
Hi Tobias,
Thx for your reply.
If your site gone live with SAP MFS, can you elaborate the challenges you faced and how you managed that? WHat kind of enhancements were performed altogether?
Also, How was multi depth bin picking is enabled in your solution?
About multiple resources: Its written that one resource can manage complete MFS part but is it constraint or can we have multiple resources manage MFS.
Appreciate your reply.
Hi Ashu,
I work for SAP. So, I cannot elaborate on our go live .
Regarding multi-depth storage please check what is offered as part of SAP EWM 9.2 (and later) based on case conveyor logic. Information can be found in SAP help, e.g. here and there.
What exactly do you mean with "resource"? SAP EWM MFS can talk to multiple PLCs in parallel. For sure it can also control multiple MFS resources such as rack feeders or stacker cranes.
Let's make an example:
You have an automated high rack with 5 aisles. Per aisle there is a MFS resource to move HUs in and out of this aisle. SAP EWM MFS can control those MFS resources. Usually, these resources would have individual queues in EWM. There could be one PLC controlling all resources or one PLC per resource (meaning 5 in sum).
For the conveyors to and from the high rack there would be one or many PLCs to control them.
Regards, Tobias
User | Count |
---|---|
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.