on 02-15-2007 9:55 AM
HI,
we have configured a RFC sender adapter in order to receive RFC calls from a R/3 system. We receive some rfc calls, but often rfc calls are stuck in the tRFC queue in the R/3 system, showing the following error message: "maximum size of requests for one LUW has been reached".
We tried to handle the problem by setting the attribute "Maximum Connections" in the adapter configuration to 5 and to 10, but the result was even worse (more error entries in R/3 system). Is the RFC call not programmed properly in R/3 system or did we configure the R/3 adapter wrong?
Regards,
Torsten
Check your source code, if you have commit work after every function call like this:
call function ...
commit work.
call function ...
commit work.
Regards
Stefan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI Torsten,
Check this note 774705.
Regards,
Sudheer
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
can let me know the size of the messageyour sending through RFC.
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy
null
Message was edited by:
Sreeram Reddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Torsten
check <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ac6de690-0201-0010-54ac-8923089dcc97">Pg# 86</a>
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Toersten,
attribute "Maximum Connections" in the adapter configuration to 5 and to 10, Make it 50.
please let me know if you still face the problem
Please reward points
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sreeram,
><i>We tried to handle the problem by setting the attribute "Maximum Connections" in the adapter configuration to 5 and to 10, but the result was even worse (more error entries in R/3 system).</i>
He has increased it from 5 to 10 and got more issues. Would changing from 10 to 50 actually solve the issue? I wonder if it will.
Regards
Bhavesh
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.